commitment? >> what we're saying, jim, we had a meeting last night with about 30 of us, that when the president can give assurances he has a deal with the senate is when we can vote on both the bills out of the house together with the president assurances that nothing will get messed up in the senate, because originally we said we wanted a senate vote, there is a few senators, we may not have as much trust as we do the president on. nothing has changed on what i or pramila or others in the progressive caucus have said. we want to send the president to europe with a big win on climate. and the big win on climate is in the build back better act. not the infrastructure bill. we have to do both together to give him that credibility that he really needs to be able to go there with. >> you said publicly you're not throwing lines, red lines out there because you want to negotiate, you want to get a deal done. >> yes. >> many of your colleagues are very publicly setting red lines. and beyond the setting of red lines, there is some lack of clarity about what their actual