dissenting opinions. it contains a lot of discussion of what level of confidence the analysts have in their conclusions. we get red team analysis where they take the devil's advocate's position. so they really have tried to change the culture, make sure that all of those views get to us so that we can evaluate them. but i'm going to give illustration how you can have people of good faith interpreting the intelligence very differently. if you look at the iran debate we're in the admit of right now, all of the republican members of the house intelligence committee on their understanding of the intelligence have come out against the agreement. all the democratic members of the same committee, looking at the same intelligence, have come out in favor of the agreement. so you can have quite a different policy conclusion based on even the same intelligence. >> the critics will argue you guys are politicians and it's a political debate, not just an intelligence debate. that's what the critics will argue. >> that's true. >> the disturbing part about this investigation, it brings back awful memories of during the vietnam war when the intelligence analysts in the