activity. we don't have the full e-mail that is in question here. he cited it, selectively, quoted it excerpted it selectively before the state department reviewed it for public relace. the state department in the same way reviewing all e-mails coming out to date, decide if there should be redactions made to e-mails, they sent them to trey gowdy with the -- >> chairman of the committee. >> yes. with the caveat he should not be releasing them or making they'll public -- >> he didn't. he described them. >> just as bad. >> you can't answer the question because you haven't seen them the full context of the e-mail still to be seen because the e-mail hasn't come out. if from what we nose based on the description of the letter last week, you had two individuals outside government transmitting that information before it ever reached hillary clinton's e-mail inbox. not only was it not marked classified as true of all e-mails have come out so far, the information was being circulated among people outside the government and lacked clearance in the first place