>> you know, it's public record, i don't think it should be hardly any limits to public record. if you want to look at an intern, we look at your twitter account we don't want somebody who is saying outlandish stuff. >> what about the private messages? >> if you want to look at something you don't have access to, not part of public record, you have to get a warrant. a warrant is not proof. all you have to do is have suspicion in a person's name. my main obz with the christies and ub rubios they want everybos information without listing a person's name, without suspicion or a judge's warrant. i'm all for getting records of potential terrorists. if i'm a judge and asked me, can we look at boston bombers' records two months beforehand, yes, i'm all for individualized searches i'm not for general sweeping dragnet. >> what a about a general sweeping dragnet who are not american citizens. >> outside the country there are no constitutional protections