you need to either get through to mr. zimmerman in this case and break it or not, correct? >> objection. compound question. >> did you understand what i said? >> repeat it, please. >> your intent in this case because of everything that was going on was that you wanted to get mr. zimmerman in a position where if you could break him, if you could get him to change his story in a significant way, then you can find out he's lying, right? >> correct. >> that's one of them. >> yes, sir. >> the very least what you do is try and crack that door open just a little bit, get just a stream of line coming through so you can really push through it if he's lying to you? >> yeah, i'm seeking the omission that maybe there's exaggeration or maybe -- >> or the anger that may be there that didn't show before or just the hit 'em with something