argument and just basically republicans' argument, and i guess what do you call them? trump apologists that there needs to be some sort of vote. >> right. i mean it's a small victory for the anti-trump side. it's not a huge deal one way or the other, i would say, because, you know, all these process arguments that the republicans are making have a short shelf life anyway, right? because they're saying this is all behind closed doors. you need a vote. well, guess what? in a few weeks' time you're going to have public hearings and there will be a vote, so help yourself guys. >> there are also 47 republicans -- >> the process arguments are so lame, so disingenuous -- >> does it work for the public, you think? >> no. i think it works for republican partisans basically to have this sense of grievance with the real kool-aid drinkers to tell them that somehow trump is being treated unfairly and you can't believe the facts. you have to focus on something else. so it's really a base argument. it's not going to be affected by anything a judge says. it's really impervious to reality. >> renato, the 75-page ruling