is noteworthy that that has been deployed successfully about what the networks own official legal status of what comes out of that show is. >> you know lawyers will occasionally, say that is very usual defense to have, but they needed in the case of some of these more importance programs and making more wild outrageous and untrue claims. in the case of tucker carlson, what you are not hearing is the network defending him. or defend the facts. i have asked the question numerous times about this and other claims. and they have just pointed back to carlson's own claims. they have not stood by it. a news organization even an opinion laden news organization should be able to defend the factual basis of what it presents even when it is strongly opinionated. and foxes are doing it here. because they have already, in a sense, have their own new size undercut any foundation for making this claim credibly with a straight face. carlson, it would, appeared doesn't care. he is interested in scoring