done yet. >> i think you're right. i think there's something moving there. during yesterday's testimony of vindman republicans blamed intel chairman adimschiff for blocking them from asking certain questions that schiff says was their attempt to identify the whistle-blower. republican congressman gym jordan refuted that charge calling schiff too sensitive. that's a cute line. while at the same time demanding to learn the whistle-blower's identity. >> it seems interesting to me that chairman schiff is so sensitive, i mean point out last week there were 435 members of congress, only one of them knows who the whistle-blower is and somehow he doesn't want anyone else to know that. mr. schiff and his staff are the only ones in america who can know. >> well, that's a cute little line, sensitive. we've been there before. on the issue here, though, i'll ask you the obvious, this is setup question. why do they want to identify or expose the whistle-blower at