been an inappropriate use of force had she grabbed the connect weapon. is that how you see this case breaking down? >> yes. so, prosecutors don't have to prove that potter intended to kill. either that she was reckless or negligent. and if you look at how different a taser looks from a gun, it's designed so that people won't make the mistake that this officer claimed that she made. so, if the juror finds that she was reckless, that is she should have known better, she could get up to 15 years. negligence almost seems like an obvious conviction. all that means is that she didn't act as a reasonable person would. we heard lots of testimony from police experts that no reasonable offer would have even used a taser in a situation like this. it was a traffic stop. >> we have seen a lot of tasers cases with racial overtone whether it was the kyle
Related Keywords
Case , Use , Force , Prosecutors , Kim Potter , Weapon , Negligent , Either , Yes , People , Taser , Officer , Mistake , Gun , Juror , Testimony , Lots , Conviction , Person , Police Experts , Negligence , Better , She Didnt Act , 15 , Lot , Situation , Cases , Tasers , Traffic Stop , Offer , Overtone , Kyle Rittenhouse ,
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.