from the preliminary hearing. i'm interested as was mentioned in the valuation question. that's where this investigation began and we don't really know what the resolution on that question s it wasn't mentioned at all in the weisselberg indictment. what the prosecutors will run up against if that's the thing they're trying to prove against trump now is even if you can show trump meant to do this, meant to inflate the valuations for one audience and deflate them for another there is a lot of room for that in new york law. that happens a lot in the world of real estate so you would have to prove that he was more braggadocios, more misleading than the average real estate person and that that pushed him to the level of criminality. there is a gray area they would have to get the charges out of. i don't think we've seen any evidence that they have a criminal case about to drop on that, but that's the thing i'm watching. >> imagine that is correct hey, guys, everybody in the real estate industry is totally misleading and we're just one of them. maybe that's a problem. thank you all so much. we are going to keep our eye on weisselberg and that pretrial