sound discretion of the trial judges. it's up to him. he is the man on the ground looking at the evidence so you see this act after act where judges have found that trump has abused the legal process or that trump has lied. his lawyers are objecting saying these are facts that have nothing to do with this case and they couldn't come in and that's just not what this argument is about because as adam has done a great job the only thing that's government could use these prior instances for at least on cross is to attack donald trump's credibility to argue you shouldn't believe anything he told you on the stand. he has lied in the past and you should judge his credibility light of all the other times he has been less than truthful. that should be enough to keep him soff the stand but with trump who knows. >> did we learn anything this