Stay updated with breaking news from Anna leschyshyn. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
and there is an effort to save it. i and there is an effort to save it. i lead the charge, full english, absolutely splendid. stephanie, i mean the us there, they are pretty good at their breakfast there aren't they as well?— they as well? also for young influencers _ they as well? also for young influencers is _ they as well? also for young influencers is not _ they as well? also for young influencers is not the - they as well? also for young influencers is not the way i they as well? also for young influencers is not the way to | they as well? also for young - influencers is not the way to start the day, — influencers is not the way to start the day, it's— influencers is not the way to start the day, it's a very healthy, but they— the day, it's a very healthy, but they are — the day, it's a very healthy, but they are good at their fried bacon and big, — they are good at their fried bacon and big, big pancakes, so it's not so different — and big, big pancakes, so it's not so different from the mother country. _ so different from the mother country, from britain. indeed, riaht, country, from britain. indeed, right. that _ country, from britain. indeed, right. that is _ country, from britain. indeed, right, that is unfortunately, i country, from britain. indeed, | right, that is unfortunately, we country, from britain. indeed, - right, that is unfortunately, we are out of time for the panel. anna, deputy political editor for the mail on sunday, thank you both for being such a wonderful panel, thank you. just before i go, i wanted to get back to new york, the developing story we've been covering over the last couple of hours of course. we've been in new york covering the trial of donald trump and just in the last 20 minutes or so donald trump left court, he spoke to reporters as he usually does on his way out, talking about the trial and
united states. interesting, one of those issues feeding _ united states. interesting, one of those issues feeding in _ united states. interesting, one of those issues feeding in where - united states. interesting, one of| those issues feeding in where we'll touch i'm sure it much more on that as the months tick by, thank you for that. anna, the floor is yours. slightly less serious, but certainly important in some ways, story. the youth are going sour on there, they are rejecting the british friar, the full english breakfast, your international viewers might be puzzled generally, but it is always had a role in english food and culture, all of this is because employers are pushing them towards avocados and more healthy options. so people are really going, young people have said they are rejecting the full english, and it's having a knock on effect, the traditional english cafe, or calf as you say, is also becoming more and more extinct.
really deeply damaging and actually quite insulting to people _ with mental health problems. and particularly to those i 1.9 million people who are on the waiting lists - who are struggling with their mental health and desperately seeking out support, - but they're unable to access it. and we know that millions of people | struggling with their mental healthl would love to be working, but if they can't access i this support, you know, - removing financial support is not going to help them move into work. it's only going to worsen their mental health. - let's bring in our panel. anna, let's come to you. what do you make of the prime minister's speech? it’s of the prime minister's speech? it's art of of the prime minister's speech? it�*s part of something he's been talking about for a while, trying to get people back into work. he's actually been concerned about this from his days at the treasury as chancellor. today, he put out a sharp statistic that britain spends more money on benefits of people than it does on a
these videos are getting millions of views online. greater manchester police say they're trying to catch the person or people making the videos. eliza hatch is the founder of cheer up luv, which is a photo series and platform that retells accounts of street harassment. she told me this is a really worrying trend. i've actually seen these videos circulating for months, and it's women who are being covertly filmed without their knowledge and without their consent on nights out, and then they are being uploaded with these tags like manchester nightlife, or liverpool nightlife or whatever kind of nightlife it might be. but with the obvious intent to humiliate and to publicly shame the women in the videos. let's bring in our panel, anna and stephanie, let's start with you anna, a really challenging issue because clearly it so hard to stop.
court _ up exponentially since he's back in court his— up exponentially since he's back in court. his followers think it's unfair— court. his followers think it's unfair that he's on trial and they give _ unfair that he's on trial and they give money and help him to cover all the costs— give money and help him to cover all the costs that he has.— the costs that he has. interesting. anna, the costs that he has. interesting. anna. what _ the costs that he has. interesting. anna, what have _ the costs that he has. interesting. anna, what have you _ the costs that he has. interesting. anna, what have you made - the costs that he has. interesting. anna, what have you made of- the costs that he has. interesting. anna, what have you made of the| anna, what have you made of the week? , ., , , anna, what have you made of the week? , ., _ ., , week? obviously today's developments are shockin: week? obviously today's developments are shocking and _ week? obviously today's developments are shocking and certainly _ week? obviously today's developments are shocking and certainly a _ week? obviously today's developments are shocking and certainly a review - are shocking and certainly a review into security — are shocking and certainly a review into security is _ are shocking and certainly a review into security is much _ are shocking and certainly a review into security is much needed. - are shocking and certainly a review into security is much needed. i- into security is much needed. i think— into security is much needed. i think studies— into security is much needed. i think studies point _ into security is much needed. i think studies point out - into security is much needed. i think studies point out how- think studies point out how donald trump _ think studies point out how donald trump will— think studies point out how donald trump will be _ think studies point out how donald trump will be taken _ think studies point out how donald trump will be taken off— think studies point out how donald trump will be taken off the - think studies point out how donald . trump will be taken off the campaign trail. trump will be taken off the campaign traii~ but _ trump will be taken off the campaign traii~ but of— trump will be taken off the campaign trail. but of course, _ trump will be taken off the campaign trail. but of course, anyone - trail. but of course, anyone watching _ trail. but of course, anyone watching this, _ trail. but of course, anyone watching this, it _ trail. but of course, anyone watching this, it will- trail. but of course, anyone watching this, it will only i watching this, it will only reinforce _ watching this, it will only reinforce their— watching this, it will only reinforce their views - watching this, it will only reinforce their views of l watching this, it will only i reinforce their views of him. watching this, it will only - reinforce their views of him. his supporters— reinforce their views of him. his supporters will— reinforce their views of him. his supporters will think— reinforce their views of him. his supporters will think it's - reinforce their views of him. his supporters will think it's a - supporters will think it's a witchhunt _ supporters will think it's a witchhunt and _ supporters will think it's a witchhunt and it's - supporters will think it's a witchhunt and it's no - supporters will think it's a . witchhunt and it's no surprise supporters will think it's a - witchhunt and it's no surprise that they're _ witchhunt and it's no surprise that they're giving _ witchhunt and it's no surprise that they're giving money— witchhunt and it's no surprise that they're giving money in— witchhunt and it's no surprise that they're giving money in small- they're giving money in small donations _ they're giving money in small donations. anyone _ they're giving money in small donations. anyone who - they're giving money in small donations. anyone who has. they're giving money in small- donations. anyone who has those views— donations. anyone who has those views will— donations. anyone who has those views will be _ donations. anyone who has those views will be reinforced _ donations. anyone who has those views will be reinforced in - donations. anyone who has those views will be reinforced in the - views will be reinforced in the courtroom _ views will be reinforced in the courtroom. he'll— views will be reinforced in the courtroom. he'll still- views will be reinforced in the courtroom. he'll still get - views will be reinforced in the courtroom. he'll still get that| courtroom. he'll still get that airtime — courtroom. he'll still get that airtime and _ courtroom. he'll still get that airtime and publicity. - courtroom. he'll still get that airtime and publicity. it- courtroom. he'll still get that
what they would ask donald trump if he were to testify. if they want to bring up other past civil cases where he was found liable for defamation, for sexual assault, for fraudulently inflating his property value to get better loans. the judge has to decide if that will be allowed. the prosecution says it's allowed. the prosecution says it's all part of showing his character, trying to impeach his character, for the jury. trying to impeach his character, for thejury. his lawyers trying to impeach his character, for the jury. his lawyers don't want any of that brought up in court whatsoever. so the judge will decide, and that will help perhaps donald trump and his decision about whether or not he will testify. thank you very much for that. let's bring in our panel. anna and stefanie standing by. stefanie, just talk us through the response and the expectation perhaps
it so they sort of do a half fast a- roach. . ., ., ,, , ., it so they sort of do a half fast a.roach. �* ., ., ,, , ., approach. anna and stephanie, back later in the programme. _ the biggest election in the world is under way in india — with millions queuing to vote despite very high temperatures. gfx in total, almost a billion people are eligible to vote — in total, almost a billion people are eligible to vote — that's roughly one in eight of the entire population of the world. more than 13 million indian citizens who live abroad can also cast their ballots, but they'll have to return to india in person to do so. although voting starts today it will take place in seven phases over the next six weeks, with the result announced on the 4th ofjune. india's prime minister narendra modi is aiming for a rare third consecutive term in power. samira hussain reports from delhi casting a ballot, exercising their democratic right, this man happily displays his inky fingers, saying the voting is in the interest of his nation. 166 million eligible voters in this first of seven faces, more
let's bring out our panel. what do you make of the israel response, anna? .. ., ~ anna? on the face of it, i think israel made — anna? on the face of it, i think israel made clear— anna? on the face of it, i think israel made clear it _ anna? on the face of it, i think israel made clear it was - anna? on the face of it, i think. israel made clear it was planning anna? on the face of it, i think- israel made clear it was planning to respond and this was the most comforting, it that's the word. i think it was both the uk side and the us really trying to urge restraint, and i think the mood coming out of both countries is that this might be it. find coming out of both countries is that this might be it.— this might be it. and i, we'll 'ust this might be it. and i, we'll 'ust t and this might be it. and i, we'll 'ust try and reconnect i this might be it. and i, we'll 'ust try and reconnect your�* this might be it. and i, we'll 'ust try and reconnect your line. h this might be it. and i, we'lljust try and reconnect your line. it's. this might be it. and i, we'lljust| try and reconnect your line. it's a little bit shaky. stefanie, the view from the us. how is it they receive
regulated. one of the ideas, anna, is 'ust to regulated. one of the ideas, anna, isiust to put _ regulated. one of the ideas, anna, isjust to put more _ regulated. one of the ideas, anna, isjust to put more onus _ regulated. one of the ideas, anna, isjust to put more onus and - regulated. one of the ideas, anna, isjust to put more onus and more | is just to put more onus and more emphasis on social media platforms to get rid, take this content down more quickly. you've clearly got balances with free speech, but what do you make of that?— do you make of that? well, yeah, aood luck do you make of that? well, yeah, good luck to _ do you make of that? well, yeah, good luck to people _ do you make of that? well, yeah, good luck to people trying - do you make of that? well, yeah, good luck to people trying to - good luck to people trying to suggest that because we've already got onus on social media companies to take down things that are racist, for example, or content that encourages children to commit suicide, and yet in reality that really doesn't really happen, their will are there to slow or don't do it at all, when you get a rare whistle—blower from one of these companies coming forward, including on reports i heard on the bbc, you know, theyjust basically admit it's not really in their interest to do it so they sort of do a half fast approach. it so they sort of do a half fast approach-—
republicans and it's going to be impossible, i think, sol, to persuade americans thaont any trum ap conviction will mean anything. so my question long-winded as it is, how corrosive and dangerous is this? >> oh come i think it is very corrosive. i think in particular, this prosecution, laura, despite the wackos that you see on msnbc that we have seen some clips of, they are actually quite a few liberal scholars who are very much question this prosecution, it judge sugarman constitutional law professor at bu said as mu h on twitter. anna written for "the washington post," they are a very troubled by this keepecution. keep in mind supposedly whatump' makes this a felony is that trump's attempt to interfere with a federal election.