Live Breaking News & Updates on Aren T Trial Lawyers
Stay updated with breaking news from Aren t trial lawyers. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
threats to her safety after being accused of being part of a conspiracy theory involving fake ballots, debunked, by the way. most of the discussion heading into today s hearing surrounds brad raffensperger who won a primary earlier this month. raffensperger was facing deep discontent from some trump supporters for pushing back on donald trump in the days before the january 6 insurrection, refusing the former president s request to, quote, find the votes trump needed to win that state. i just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state. flipping the state is a great testament to our country. ladies, in the hearings so far, each followed a pattern. donald trump was told he lost. he told his supporters that he won anyway. donald trump was told that there was no fraud. he told his supporters that there was fraud. donald trump was told that mike pence did not have the power to overturn the election. he said mike pence had the pow ....
Good day, everyone. Im Andrea Mitchell in new york along with my colleague and friend, Chris Jansing, as history is being made in that Lower Manhattan courtroom. Donald trump is the first former president of the United States to stand as a defendant in a criminal trial. At any moment, could be facing the first witness to testify against him. Thats expected to be former National Enquirer publisher, david pecker. Hes likely to be pressed about alleged efforts to bury damaging stories about donald trump during the 2016 election. Earlier this morning, prosecutors gave their open statement, accusing mr. Trump of a criminal conspiracy to hide embarrassing relationships by preventing them from getting into the pres ....
Christian, likely than the other jurors . They dont appear to be trial lawyers, so its very different. I heard someone write theyve heard this instruction lots of times. Most lawyers arent trial lawyers. If theyre trial lawyers, yes, theyre used to objection and sustained. If theyve never set foot in the courtroom, theyre lawyers. I have a bias, i would never put a lawyer on a jury unless thats all im left with. Im afraid theyre thinking too much because thats what lawyers do, and theyre secondguessing. It depends on the lawyer. As i said, if theyre trial lawyers, and i dont think either of them are, thats a problem. Let us bring in someone who actually saw Donald Trump in the courtroom, rachel maddow. Msnbcs rachel maddow, one of the very few people inside the courtroom today. Rachel, fill in the gaps. What was it like . Reporter first of all, thanks for having me and thanks ....
Is there more evidence to build that case? this is sometimes a complicated inquiry for people who aren t trial lawyers. we get hung up on this notion of direct evidence. actually, trial lawyers can use direct evidence or they are use circumstantial evidence. maybe this example will explain how that will play into today s hearing. if you and i watch it snow, then we can say it snowed. that s direct testimony. if we go to sleep at night and there s no snow on the ground the and we wake up in the morning and there s snow, there s a pretty good chance it snowed overnight. that s circumstantial. a lot of the evidence that we are looking at so far about the former president s involvement is circumstantial. nobody is saying, i heard him say he knew he lost the election and wanted the people in georgia to make up the number of votes that he needed. but his own words on tape, it s awfully close. it s very good circumstantial evidence that he knew what the numbers looked like, his campaign fol ....