Page 37 - Ask Party News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The ship was big. I could see it when i was walking over here. The late news with sara donchey. We start with the breaking news. Driverless car crashed into a pedestrian there say massive and Police Fire Response at 5th and market streets right now. We are live there for us. Betty yu, i know you were working on an entirely different story when you heard about what happened here. Can you tell us about what we are seeing and what we know that happened to this person . Reporter sara, as you can see there is a very active crime scene happening. An investigation just behind me. You can see part of ...

Is because theres two big reasons. One is that with joe bidens age as we go into this election, the question of whether Kamala Harris is ready to serve as Vice President is sort of paramount among voters minds and you certainly see this already in the campaign. You saw nikki haley talk about it a lot. Also going to see trump former President Donald Trump bring it up, too of the with the very real possibility that Kamala Harris could be the 47th president of the United States if President Joe Biden runs and wins and whether or not he can serve a full term. So thats a big reason why i wrote the ...

Continues. Host Charlie Spiering is here with us, senior political reporter with the daily mail, author of this book, amateur hour Kamala Harris in the white house. Why did you write this book . Guest hi, thanks for having me. Big part of why i wrote the book is because theres two big reasons. One is that with joe bidens age as we go into this election, the question of whether Kamala Harris is ready to serve as Vice President is sort of paramount among voters minds and you certainly see this already in the campaign. You saw nikki haley talk about it a lot. Also going to see trump former Presid...

Admitting that these facts were so inextricably intertwined in a colloquy with justice barrett, that it would be very difficult to separate them out on remand. Thats how i interpreted his statements. Please to translate that for people watching, that means that basically, if it wasnt official act, they would not be able to use that potentially at trial. He was arguing they should be able to use it to paint a bigger picture. But trump has argued, total immunity. He has not said, well, some of these are private x. This would mean the case could at least in part go forward and go to trial, we bel...

Im period in question. I thought in many what we did a concession at all was Michael Dreeben essentially admitting the attorney for the special counsels office, essentially admitting that these facts were so inextricably intertwined in a colloquy with justice barrett, that it would be very difficult to separate them out on remand. Thats how i interpret for his statements at least. Well, and to translate that for people watching, that means that basically, if it wasnt official act, they would not be able to use that potentially at trial. He was arguing they should be able to use it to paint a b...