The predominantly kurdish areas that have diverted this rural mountainous combat into the urban setting. Which means that now we have a setting in which theres more civilian involvement and also more potential civilian casualties as well. What about the pkk . In 1990s, pkk was pretty much a monolithic topdown entity with very compact Decision Making. Turkeys argument and position throughout the 1990s was very clear. Get rid of pkks leadership and the organization is going to collapse. In 2015, we have a much different pkk which has decided to engage in splintering strategy, especially valid after the arrests and capture of its founding leader in 1999. The 2015 pkk is much more different than the 1990s pkk in the sense that Decision Making is more localized, clashes and command is also more localized, even though the central executive body is quite influential as well. Main difference is the emergence of localized leadership that younger cohort used to be the bridge between the pkk and
Political type revolution, someone pointed out already that we have new generation of or maybe geographical changes. Do you characterize this coming election outcome, characterize it more by recuring political outcome or having coming together . Do you want to take that . Yeah. I think i already mentioned in my remark there that this election will obviously trigger a generational shift. That will clearly be the case with dpp or for the green camp as a whole. And also, a lot of people in their 30s or even late 20s, they have been very active in social movement and also grassroots organization. They will steadily climb up the ladder and become an important forces in shaping the electoral politics. It depends on how his party and his own turn out. Ing . He might be around for quite a while, if his party turns out to be a critical voting bloc, then you know. On the other hand, if in the end, a lot of the voters abandoned him in the very end and his party actually couldnt really play a very