Page 48 - Christopher Stephens News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

also. >> no, i don't like watters world. all the america rejects watters world. bill o'reilly doesn't like watters world. >> jesse watters scooping out the super bowl party. >> o'reilly has a few questions for you. >> good, good, good. i didn't do it. >> caution, you are about to enter the no spin zone. the factor begins right now. >> i'm bill o'reilly. we have a lot to talk to you about this evening as i interviewed president obama at the white house. we opened the program with the taped interview that was done immediately after the live interview that you saw. so this is all brand ...

Was the fog of war and these are human beings and things happen. it's not that simple. repeated attacks in benghazi, okay in the fact that chris stevens and two occasions rejected additional security, that really ♪ relevant. what's relevant rant is did we have facts to underscore the need for additional security and to have military resources nearby. >> i just want to know why didn't we beef up security? why the state department didn't do it. that's all. that's simple. and the other questions i have got to go. the other question is why i want to know why susan rice went out there. who put he...

Currently served by a fair media most press outlets are sympathetic to the democratic party and will only reluctantly cover stories that make the dems look bad. benghazi is a very important story because it goes to the efficiency and honesty of the federal government. maybe some day we will find out what really happened. maybe some day. that's the memo. now for the top story tonight. reaction, first up ms. laura ingraham who joins us from washington. and you say? >> well, bill, the fact that when that first report dropped this week, the house report, there was, as you pointed out, basically a ...

Was the fog of war and these are human beings and things happen. it's not that simple. repeated attacks in benghazi, okay in the fact that chris stevens and two occasions rejected additional security, that really ♪ relevant. what's relevant rant is did we have facts to underscore the need for additional security and to have military resources nearby. >> i just want to know why didn't we beef up security? why the state department didn't do it. that's all. that's simple. and the other questions i have got to go. the other question is why i want to know why susan rice went out there. who put he...

Politics. >> so john, this issue especially it's hard to break through all the partisan noise and get to the facts. who does this report hold responsible for the failures in benghazi? >> reporter: it's a damning indictment of the state department, anderson. the report says there was warning after warning after warning that something bad was about to happen that, there were islamist element training, threats against western institutions including against u.s. institutions and that yet security was not beefed up it also criticized the ambassador christopher stephens. it said he himself was aware...