Page 7 - Collusion Issue News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

They were going through the questioning of the president, what questions they can ask of the president. the lawyers for the president worked very hard to keep any questions out about the obstruction. >> absolutely. >> now we understand why. they were legitimately concerned about the obstruction issue. they knew on the collusion issue, they felt a little stronger about it. it seems even reading this report, this is where the special counsel's office, that's the position they took as well. >> and it may be the reason. that may be the reason it says we can't exonerate him, because they didn't tal...

The experience back in 98. when it was over, it was over. no one wanted to talk about it again. everybody talked about monica lewinsky for an entire year. everyone talked about russia collusion for two years. i think there's russia collusion exhaustion. neil: but i think it veered from the collusion issue to your point. this does not address collusion because it doesn't find evidence to that. if that is indeed the case that no one has been charged directly with conspiring russia to rig an election which is the initial intent. if it's veered now with these other investigations into the business...

Investigate? i know you're focussed on this collusion issue. >> that's why we had the special counsel. >> yeah. with regard the collusion issue, i would like to know what mr. mueller thought he could not pursue on his own but he needed assistance from other investigative agencies or u.s. attorneys who are also continuing their investigations. in other words i'm curious whether in this report -- and i think the american people must see this report by the way -- whether this was a midterm report or a final thesis? did he basically farm out the rest of the investigation to other u.s. attorneys to...

To stay at nine justices. dems court packing plan is all wrong. in that piece he talked about our institutions suffering a crisis. we should do no further harm. he have will propose a constitutional amendment that would prevent changing the face of our supreme court. where do you stand on this issue? >> well, i'm not in favor of -- i'm not in favor of changing the number of justices. i'm not in favor of this court packing plan. the only time it has every been tried in american history was by fdr and it resulted in a crushing blow to him. it really damaged his popularity in a way he never recov...

So they now go after these 81 individuals. i point out, too, as a resident of the swamp here in washington a long time, this is the free employment bill for lawyers. we have more lawyers per capita here than any other city. 81 lawyers will be called within the next few days. but important long-term potential political advantage for the president. he continues to talk about the country, work for the country, and points out that they are not about that. they are about just getting him and the american people will say wait a minute, we want someone who is interested in our problems, not just purs...