That does not account for others that come into the area that work here, who have a 49 square mile city. So these people do the odds. There are some bad apples everywhere. If we have them have this background check, we can eliminate some of the bad apples, it will be good for both industries, im urging an aye vote here. Supervisors, we are your City Industry and were being thrown under the muni vote. If they start putting taxicabs out of business when theyre really close, they can do whatever they want because they have no 1 regulating, thank you for your time. Thank you. Next speaker please. Good evening, thank you for allowing us to speak, my name is marcel. I have been driving a taxi full time in this city for 28 years. I came here to urge this board to support supervisor peskins resolution urging the cpuc, to adopt fingerprinting, for all drivers, its a noncontroversial safety measure for drivers. It is the most reliable way to confirm a persons, identity. If i could have the overh
Officers, of citizens, complaints, is that correct . And real estate. Somebody said real estate. Okay. No. The original proposal, if i may madame president , had both the office of labor standards and enforcement nocc under the public advocate, the amendment made in committee was actually with respect to both offices not have them been under public advocate, but to have the public advocate appoint the heads so the officers, were not moved under public advocate, actually, the public advocate had the ability to appoint. So that was different. But you didnt pull them out, you just changed it . I dont understand the question. For some reason, i was under the impression for example, office of citizens, complaints, was removed from public advocate in committee, and now placed back in but in a different form. What happened in committee is the way the olsc and the occ were left after i amended. After the committee made the other amendments, is those 2 offices were not under public advocate, th
Complaints, is that correct . And real estate. Somebody said real estate. Okay. No. The original proposal, if i may madame president , had both the office of labor standards and enforcement nocc under the public advocate, the amendment made in committee was actually with respect to both offices not have them been under public advocate, but to have the public advocate appoint the heads so the officers, were not moved under public advocate, actually, the public advocate had the ability to appoint. So that was different. But you didnt pull them out, you just changed it . I dont understand the question. For some reason, i was under the impression for example, office of citizens, complaints, was removed from public advocate in committee, and now placed back in but in a different form. What happened in committee is the way the olsc and the occ were left after i amended. After the committee made the other amendments, is those 2 offices were not under public advocate, they remained where they
Complaints, is that correct . And real estate. Somebody said real estate. Okay. No. The original proposal, if i may madame president , had both the office of labor standards and enforcement nocc under the public advocate, the amendment made in committee was actually with respect to both offices not have them been under public advocate, but to have the public advocate appoint the heads so the officers, were not moved under public advocate, actually, the public advocate had the ability to appoint. So that was different. But you didnt pull them out, u just changed it . I dont understand the question. For some reason, i was under the impression for example, office of citizens, complaints, was removed from public advocate in committee, and now placed back in but in a different form. What happened in committee is the way the olsc and the occ were left after i amended. After the committee made the other amendments, is those 2 offices were not under public advocate, they remained where they we
Victims and lawmakers. There are thousands and thousands of people who are homeless tonight, who are without jobs, who lost their business. This is absolutely indefensible. Speaker boehner is a good man in general. Hes under huge pressure, but he shouldnt have allowed all that pressure to be taken out on new yorks homeowners, new yorks Small Business owners, new york taxpayers. Reporter fema money is down from 7 billion to 3. 5 billion loan money will run out next week says schumer before the january vote. More community, the Community Block Development Fund which provides large amounts of money for local governments to rebuild projects like the mta and gives homeowners large loans to rebuild their homes must have money from the sandy relief. In for rockaway construction worker Michael Guerrero has borrowed 30,000 from his credit cards, got a 25,000 loan from his boss. He needs 100,000 more to rebuild his home and insurance is not answering his calls. Its ridiculous whats going on up t