Live Breaking News & Updates on Data americas inc

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Data americas inc on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Data americas inc and stay connected to the pulse of your community

District Court Granted Dismissal Because The Patent Recited A Patent-Ineligible Abstract Idea Of Processing And Transmitting Data - Intellectual Property

Chief Judge Lynn in the Northern District of Texas recently granted a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss a complaint alleging patent infringement because the claim-at-issue recites patent-ineligible subject matter...

Texas , United-states , Cable-communications , Data-americas-inc , Comcast , Way-media-ltd , Plaintiff-magnacross , Bank-intl , Alice-corp , Chief-judge-lynn , Northern-district

District Court Granted Dismissal Because the Patent Recited a Patent-Ineligible Abstract Idea of Processing and Transmitting Data | Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Chief Judge Lynn in the Northern District of Texas recently granted a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss a complaint alleging patent infringement because the claim-at-issue recites...

Texas , United-states , Akin-gump-strauss-hauer-feld , Comcast-cable-communications , Plaintiff-magnacross , Bank-intl , Us-supreme-court , Data-americas-inc , Way-media-ltd , Alice-corp , Akin-gump-strauss-hauer

Latest Federal Court Cases - February 2021 #2 | Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi
, Appeal No. 2020-1074 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2021)
In this week’s Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s JMOL ruling that asserted claims of two related pharmaceutical patents were invalid because their shared specification did not enable the full scope of the claims. The patents were directed to synthetic antibodies used in high cholesterol treatments that operate by binding to specified amino acids (or “residues”) of enzyme PCSK9, thereby blocking PCSK9 from binding to LDL cholesterol receptors (“LDLR”) and permitting those receptors to remove LDL cholesterol from the bloodstream.
The claims at issue contained dual functional limitations, requiring that a claimed antibody both bind to at least one or two of numerous listed PCSK9 residues (i.e., in ranges from one or two residues to all of them), and that the antibodies block the PCSK9/LDLR interaction. Appellee Sanofi contended that because there are millions of antibody candidates potentially falling within the scope of the claims, and because antibody generation is unpredictable, practicing the full scope of the claims would require substantial trial and error in screening each candidate antibody for the claimed binding and blocking functionalities. Appellant patent owner Amgen contended that in finding the claims not enabled, the district court erred by focusing on the effort required to discover and make every embodiment of the claims, that the patent adequately disclosed the required screening methods, and that the examples provided were sufficiently structurally representative to enable the claims.

Bazsi-takacs , Anniee-white , Nikaf-aldrich , Scottd-eads , Michaela-cofield , Jason-wrubleski , Amgen , Us-patent-office , Synchronoss-technologies-inc , Loyalty-inc , Maritz-holdings-inc , Dawgs-inc