Live Breaking News & Updates on December 9th Meeting
Stay updated with breaking news from December 9th meeting. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
There is a its interesting, theyre talking almost exclusively about the abuse of power, theyre not talking much about the obstruction of congress. But i think this has been a civil he had kageducation here,e can decide whether this has been an Impeachable Offense here, because the issues have been aired out well on both sides. Theyre about to finish the roll call. The republicans will lose the democrats who will win, and then a second one will be introduced. Mr. Richmond, you are not reported. No. Mr. Richmond votes no. Are there any other members that havent voted who wish to vote . Mr. Chairman, there are 17 ayes and 23 nos. The amendment is not agreed to. Is there any further amendment. Mr. Gates . I amend to the desk. The gentlelady reserves a point of order. Amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to hr 755 offered by mr. Gates of florida, page 3, strike out lines 10 and 11 and enter the following. A kno ....
That s the case over 50 years ago when the rule was written, when rule 6 was written. it said its normal procedure for witnesses representing both sides of the issue to give testimony at committee hearings. and that s what happened at the december 4th meeting. and that s what happened at the december 9th meeting. let s be honest about the rules. and house resolution 660, i would point out again, provides an opportunity for the president of the united states to come. he could have come on december 4th. he could have sent any of his witnesses. and he didn t. but no one should be surprised. because that s been the president s approach throughout, is to refuse to allow anyone anyone with the kind of information my colleagues claim they re interested in from coming to testify and answer questions directly. with that i yield to the gentleman from new york, mr. jeffries. it s my time. i d be happy to yield to the ....
Come in. it istn absolutely true that s e case. over 50 years ago when the rule was written, when rule six was written, it set it to give both sides at committee hearings. that s what happened at the december 4th meeting and the december 9th meeting. let s be honest about the rules. and houseth resolution 660 i wod point out again provides an opportunity for the president of thefo united states to come. he could haveto come on decembe 4th. he could have sent any of his witnesses, and he didn t. but no one should be surprised because that s beened the president s approach throughout is to refuse to allow anyone anyone with the kind of information my colleagues claim they re interested in from coming to testify, from coming to answer questions directly. with that i yield to my friend from new york, mr. jeffries. i thank the distinguished gentleman ....