Dick Gregorie News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Involvement seems particularly notable. According to the indictment, he played a key role in what appears to be a Pressure Campaign from trump and his co defendant, Valet Walt Nauta and maralago property manager carlos de oliveira, to delete Security Footage from the club after it was subpoenaed by prosecutors. And now, it sure seems like employee 4 could be talking, it turns out, he is an i. T. Worker for maralago named yuscil taveras. According to one new report, taveras himself received a Target Letter from the department of justice after trump was first indicted in florida. But taveras him...

Good evening from washington. I am mehdi hasan in for chris hayes. Donald trump could end up behind bars next year for conspiracy to obstruct justice. And if he does, it may very well be because of a new testimony by someone identified by the justice department, only as Trump Employee 4. Now that we have had all weekend to digest the new Superseding Indictment for donald trump from doj special counsel jack smith and the classified documents case, employee number fours involvement seems particularly notable. According to the indictment, he played a key role in what appears to be a Pressure Camp...

President Biden made a political calculation in releasing Alex Saab from prison. But will the release start a new surge of immigrants at our border?

Former prisoner for nauta, for de oliveira, the threat is quite real for them, is it not? >> it absolutely is. one thing is very interesting, i think all three of these men are facing criminal exposure and years in prison. but what is different about donald trump as a secret service protectee, i think he's got a pretty good argument about why his sentence should be served in home confinement, or some other way, other than going to a penal institution the way most people do, which is, i think, too objectionable for the secret service to have their protectee in that environment. and so, while do...

You don't, the first time around, it did not specify that they had the document. but this time around, it says specifically that donald trump showed that document to a person on authorized to see it. and it is listed as a substantive count. it is then you count 32 in the superseding indictment. i don't think they would do that unless they had a document which they could fix an exhibit sticker and introduce into evidence. it appears that since the last time, they've gotten their hands on that document, or they have clarified which document it is, perhaps by talking with that witness about what ...