United states citizens would not be required to submit to this intrusive Surveillance Technology as a condition of traveling this new notice suggests that the government is reneging on what was already in sufficient promise. Which is not surprising given that the u. S. Governments history of making promises to respect our privacy is about is its about as trustworthy as your boyfriends but delany while vacationing in bagus over Super Bowl Weekend come on we all know we cheated and that my friends is why we must always be watching the whole this. Is the. Real thing its like. The blood of. Like you know that i got. To. Welcome everybody to watching the hogs i am i wrote them for and joining us today to discuss Homeland Security his new love affair with facial Recognition Technology is legal journalist and contributor contributor to americas lawyer with might happen tony of the fantastic malia boils molly always a pleasure thank you. Thank you all right so is this new push by the d h s to
A pleasure thank you. Thank you all right so is this new push by the d h s to implement facial Recognition Technology and u. S. Citizens entering an exit in the country was it do you think was ultimately inevitable i mean were we always going to end up in this direction because thats just seems where our government wants to go. I think thats exactly right this department is for pres facial recognition checks for all people now traveling in and out of the United States including as you said u. S. Citizens not just foreigners not just visitors and this is new but as you said it probably was something theyve been wanting to do all along youve seen other Law Enforcement agencies already attempting to do it theres a 1000000000. 00 in fact set aside for the f. B. I. To build a data system and well talk about that in a 2nd but before this particular proposal citizens had been exempt from those mandatory checks no no no were not going to scan your face but now they want to scan your face homa
On what was already in sufficient promise which is not surprising given that the u. S. Governments history of making promises to respect our privacy is about is its about as trustworthy as your boyfriends but delany while vacationing in bagus over Super Bowl Weekend and we all know we cheated and that my friends is why we must always be watching the whole us. Like you know that i got. This. Welcome everybody to watching the hogs i i wrote them for and joining us today to discuss Homeland Security his new love affair with facial Recognition Technology is legal journal and stan contributor contributor to americas lawyer with might happen tony of the fantastic molly boils molly always a pleasure thank you. Thank you all right so is this new push by the d h s to implement facial Recognition Technology and u. S. Citizens entering an exit in the country was it do you think was ultimately inevitable i mean were we always going to end up in this direction because thats just seems where our gov
About stand by principles and you know if the Birmingham University has a set of values which are the spouses in this country it should ensure that those values are also spiles wherever its chooses to put up campuses outside of this country it cant have one law for people in britain and then a different law for people in dubai that smacks of our ignorance its next of western privilege it smacks of disrespecting the human rights of the people of dubai and i want to say that this is not just about the human rights of the lecturers and staff of the university its also about the human rights of the people in dubai itself live under a very very oppressive regime ok we have to leave it there for now mohammed if we can Peter Tatchell thanks very much for joining us on r. T. So we look from moscow for this hour your next update from us follows watching the hawks. Greetings and salutation now that we are in full Holiday Season mode here in the United States of america many of us are taking the
United states house of representatives. Any use of the closedcaptioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u. S. House of representatives. ]. The yeas are 191 and the nays are 236. Those in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. In thepinion of the chair the ays have it. I request the yeas and nays. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from texas is recognized. Mr. Hensarling i request the yeas and nays. The speaker pro tempore the yeas and nays are requested. Those in favor of the vote will rise. Members will record their votes by electronic device. Members, this is a fiveminute vote. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc. , in cooperation with the United States house of representatives. Any use of the closedcaptioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u. S. House of representatives. ] the speaker pro tempore on this this 24 3rk