Page 2 - Edwards Trial News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Cochran this is asserted to conservative up on going g abv criminal activity. smith doing that? because he got burned in the edwards trial, he isan figuring let me get access to when that lawyer andbo trumutp have talked about and i will use the crime fraud extension. ladies and gentlemen this is an abuse of the crime fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege. he has no evidence whatsoever. s in secret in front of a judge of what donald trump and the lawyer discussed. unless he has violated attorney-client privilege with other lawyers who areso surrounding donald trump, mr. smith has ca...

Using this privilege is being asserted to cover-up on going be on obstruction and criminal activity. so why is smith doing that? he got burned in the edwards trial. and he figures let me get ahead of the curve, and access to what this lawyer cochran and trump have talked about, and i will utes the crime fraud exception, ladies and gentlemen this is an apuce of the crime fraud exception to attorney-client priv lprivilege. he has no evidence whatsoever. unless he has violated the attorney-client privilege with other lawyers who are surrounding donald trump, so far mr. smith called in three lawye...

Career-ending affairs do more than ruin your personal life. Learn about 10 examples of career-ending affairs.

The key thing here is one of the purposes, not the only purpose, correct? >> exactly. so even when the president says things like, oh, it was done for personal reasons to avoid embarrassment to his wife or whatever, that doesn't get him out of the edwards precedent, which as you say, one of the purposes being to influence an election. number two, the documentary evidence here and the witnesses in the trump investigation are very, very different than the 101-year-old key witnesses who couldn't even show up in the edwards trial. here you also have shell corporations and all sorts of fraudulent p...

Edwards case actually said, when you look at it, that it is a federal felony to take hush money if one of the purposes of that hush money was to influence the campaign. >> one of the purposes, not -- the key thing here is, one of the purposes, not the only purpose, correct? >> exactly. so even when the president says things like, oh, it was done for personal reasons to avoid embarrassment to his wife or whatever, that doesn't get him out of the edwards precedent, which is, as you say, one of the purposes being to influence an election. number two, the documentary evidence here and the witnesse...