We will allow two minutes for Public Comment and as always, please mute any background noise that could interfere with us being able to hear what you are trying to say. Mute yourselves unless you are speaking or would like to be heard. Thank you. Sergeant line item 1, report to the commission discussion. Weekly crime trends. Provide an overview of San Francisco. Provide say automatic reof planned activitieunplanned even. Having an impact on Public Safety. Commission discussion and activities the chief describes will be limited to determining whether the calender for a four meetings and the sb421 Monthly Update and the collaborative updates and presentations regarding prevention and intervention strategies. G. Chief, yo good evening, c. You are muted. Good evening, Vice President taylor. Welcome back. Executive director henderson. I will start out this weeks chief report with the weekly crime trends starting with part one crime and we are down 37 from last week, year to date, were over
You have a quorum. Also here tonight we have chief Williams Scott from the San Francisco Police Department and Paul Henderson from the department of Police Accountability. Thank you. For members of the public, who would like to make comment, the number to call is 415 6550001 access code 146 270 1967. We will allow two minutes for Public Comment and as always, please mute any background noise that could interfere with us being able to hear what you are trying to say. Mute yourselves unless you are speaking or would like to be heard. Thank you. Sergeant line item 1, report to the commission discussion. Weekly crime trends. Provide an overview of San Francisco. Provide say automatic reof planned activitieunplanned even. Having an impact on Public Safety. Commission discussion and activities the chief describes will be limited to determining whether the calender for a four meetings and the sb421 Monthly Update and the collaborative updates and presentations regarding prevention and interve
Can you please call roll. [roll call] you have a quorum. Also here tonight we have chief Williams Scott from the San Francisco Police Department and Paul Henderson from the department of Police Accountability. Thank you. For members of the public, who would like to make comment, the number to call is 415 6550001 access code 146 270 1967. We will allow two minutes for Public Comment and as always, please mute any background noise that could interfere with us being able to hear what you are trying to say. Mute yourselves unless you are speaking or would like to be heard. Thank you. Sergeant line item 1, report to the commission discussion. Weekly crime trends. Provide an overview of San Francisco. Provide say automatic reof planned activitieunplanned even. Having an impact on Public Safety. Commission discussion and activities the chief describes will be limited to determining whether the calender for a four meetings and the sb421 Monthly Update and the collaborative updates and presenta
Versus regions of the university of california and related cases. General francisco, general francisco. In 2017, the fifth circuit held that dhaka and expansion were likely unlawful. Face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security determined that it no longer wish to retain the policy based on its belief that the policy was illegal, has doubt about its illegality, and its general opposition to broad, nonenforcement policies. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. Previousion ended a nonenforcement policy by which the department agreed to not enforce the ima against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. The decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the unreviewable discretion, unless the statute restricts it. Nothing in the ina requires the department, a Law Enforcement agency, do not enforce the law. Decision to and this nonenforcement policy was reasonable. Dr. Was a temporary measure that on
Cases. The justices are expected to hand out a decision next spring. [screams] you will hear argument first in 587, the department of Homeland Security versus legions of the university of california and the related cases. General francisco,. In 2017, the fifth circuit held a daca in the expansion of daca was likely unlawful. The judgment affirmed by equally divided courts. In the face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security reasonably determined that it no longer wish to retain the daca policy. Based on his belief that the policy was illegal with serious doubts about the illegality and the general proposition abroad not efficient policy. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The rescission ended up nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. But the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agency under fuel discussio