For Bannon News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

arizona. so who has the upper hand? let's go out front. and good evening, i'm erin burnett. out front tonight, a victory for the rule of law. that's the words from the top two members of the january 6th select committee. after trump's long-time ally steve bannon was found guilty of contempt for refusing to appear before the committee. congressman bennie thompson and congresswoman liz cheney came out with a warning, for anyone else who tries to on strubt or stone wall their investigation, just as there must be accountability for all those responsible for the events of january 6th, any...

weather center. >> live from cnn center, this is cnn newsroom with kim brunhuber. >> we begin with both new hope and a new round of fighting in ukraine. officials say 13 missiles struck a city about 300 kilometer north of mykolaiv, leaving a number of people injured and killed. the missiles targeted military airfield and a railway facility. officials are urging people to stay in shelters for now while the mayor of mykolaiv is reporting what he calls powerful blasts in that city. but on the hopeful side, ukraine and russia have signed an agreement that will allow ukraine to resume gra...

One longtime Bannon watcher says it’s too early to count him out – even a prison term could enhance his status among the Maga crowd

Gasston boiling it down. bannon didn't show up. he has contempt for our system of government, and he does not think he needs the play by its rules. she compared his offense to snubbing a parking ticket, a sorely relevant package in and said the former white house chief strategist chose allegiance to donald trump over compliance to the law. >> i stand with trump and the constitution. and i will never back off that, ever. >> reporter: as for bannon's last gasp offer to testify publicly before the committee -- >> give me a date, a time, a room number, a microphone and a holy bible that i can take...

Is crime fraud to these discussions. these have nothing to do with the job of the chief of staff to help in an insurrection. i think that it should have been applied. his indictment should have been seen as valid as much as the boroughs. as for scavino, i cannot explain why he is different than navarro's or bannon's. navarro was in the white house, bannon was not. but once you get inside the white house and say that someone can be subpoenaed and indicted for obstruction, well then, why not scavino and why not meadows? >> yeah, i know, i think it is a lot of questions that we are having. it see...