Rutgers COVID vaccine lawsuit argues mandate against law
The lawsuit argues the mandate is an "affront to human dignity and personal freedom because it violates our basic right to control our bodies."
Stay updated with breaking news from Frank Easterbrook. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The lawsuit argues the mandate is an "affront to human dignity and personal freedom because it violates our basic right to control our bodies."
The following editorial appeared in the New York Daily News:
As more governments and employers across the country begin to impose mandatory vaccination requirements as a condition of returning to the physical workplace or classroom, legal challenges to such policies are inevitable.
La Corte Suprema de EEUU ratificó el mandato de vacunación obligatoria contra el coronavirus que dispuso la Universidad de Indiana para el cursado presencial.Lo hizo al rechazar una “sol
The Supreme Court announced Aug. 12 that it will not hear an appeal from a group of students at Indiana University who are opposed to the univ...