Stay updated with breaking news from Interviewe. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
U.sin that balloon. and there are growing concernso that even us companies may have been able to skirt sanctions to sell china. the balloons, antenna and surveillance tech.hese we know the prc use theseor sur balloons for surveillancvee. paa a senior state department official said high resolution imagery from two flybysy bu revealed that the high altitude balloon was capables thae ofs conducting signals intelligence collection and signals. b intelligence refers to information that is gathered by electronic mean,s, things like communications and radars. . that sounds really ominous, butt to our commander in chiefroug who slept through his interviewe with pbs srv judy woodruff. j have relations now between the u.s. and china taken a big hit knowingly? no. now. how do you know? i know. i talk to i mean, the idea of baooting down a balloon that s ....
0 sean: be we have left for this evening. before we go , i want to remind availabl season twfore wo of the miseducation of america is available now on fox nation. nation checki hope you ll check. also, don t forget to watchad us tomorrow morning. on fox and friends saturdayh yo and sunday morning. we love sharing it with you.n sean will be back on monday. don t let your heart be troubled. troubl let not your heart be troubled. i should get it right. the ingraham angle is next. happy friday. happy friday. laura: hi, everybody. hi, everybody. i m laura ingraham and this is the ingraham angle from washington tonight. thatks for beingshington with u the wheels are coming off.f ton that s the focus of tonight s angle. t ou there was a desperate effort to show that our commander in chief is actually making sound independent, important decisions today. i can confirm that the department of defense was tracking a high altitude object over alaska airspace ine in t the last twenty four ....
We cannot start the recruitment process unless we have candidates in our talent pull attending those interviews. this our talent pull attending those interviewe our talent pull attending those interviews. , , ., ., interviews. as things are, do you think there interviews. as things are, do you think there is interviews. as things are, do you think there is a interviews. as things are, do you think there is a chance interviews. as things are, do you think there is a chance the i interviews. as things are, do you l think there is a chance the industry can get people into the rightjobs ijy can get people into the rightjobs by the summer? i do can get people into the right “obs by the summer?i by the summer? i do believe the industry is by the summer? i do believe the industry is doing by the summer? i do believe the industry is doing everything i by the summer? i do believe the industry is doing everything they! industry is doing everything they can to get the volumes of ....
Perhaps blow the investigation wide open. we know peter navarro had direct access to the president, can speak to his state of mind, perhaps, even his consciousness of guilt if we want to use that term. we also know that he was the clearing house for a lot of these strategies for defrauding the american people from the free and fair election. but it is what you just said. he has also bragged that they had an had over 100 members of congress ready to participate in this coup. and so while peter navarro might seem to be someone that can testify about the president the j 6 committee is about to learn who among their peers was now involved in this. now, will peter navarro give those names? i think it s obvious he is a fairly undisciplined interviewe and is willing to tell you what he did. if he begins naming names because he has a cavalier attitude that somehow they were engaged in something wrong the american people now might begin to identify which sitting members of congress were invol ....
Let me turn to a question of whether he should be interviewe interviewed. that number doesn t surprise me and i don t think his lawyers are resisting this because they think he is guilty. i think they re resisting this because they think this guy is such a loose cannon and a lot of the times he s so inarticulate they will never say this he s so inarticulate that he might fumble his way into saying something that isn t true and he might get in trouble that way. even straightforward questions. martha: they are concerned because he s donald trump and they ve seen the way he s answering questions and he speaks in hyperbole. i would imagine they are very concerned. if you are representing him would you recommend that explains it in our view and the viewpoint of a lot of public, if he s got nothing to hide, why not answer questions? you look a little deeper and you think maybe not. ....