Stay updated with breaking news from It published. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
here her new book drowning the rescue of floyd for the 20. well i'm staring at the american dream. please tell us your story. >> i am a 15-year overnight success. i was avoided in and returned years i had the idea as you said on a flight on a red eye from l.a. to new york, and i put the passengers asleep on the red eyes and i go to work. i started writing my books by hand on the forward galley while everybody slept, and flight after flight i cobbled a book, and then i went forth to get a literary agent to get it published, and 41 literary agents in a row rejected me, and my 42nd was my one and only yes. >> but how? i have dozens of spiral notebooks filled with ideas for books, for businesses, for shows that i have never executed on. and we all do. what gave you the fortitude to
i started writing my books by hand on the forward galley while everybody slept, and flight after flight i cobbled a book, and then i went forth to get a literary agent to get it published, and 41 literary agents in a row rejected me, and my 42nd was my one and only yes. >> but how? i have dozens of spiral notebooks filled with ideas for books, for businesses, for shows that i have never executed on. and we all do. what gave you the fortitude to execute? >> i just believed in the idea. and i believed that if i could tell the story right, that people would connect with it. and they have. my first book falling the one that i wrote on the plane, deputy number two on the new york times bestseller list and became so ministers fastest hard-core selling debut in four years. my second book, drowning also debuted on the new york times bestseller list and both of those have movie deals. following this with universal and warner brothers with drowning. i just knew if i could tell the stories right people connect, that it would be an experience for them that they would love to go on these rides with me,
premier league, it is completely disproportionate, it is not a level playing field and the money is at the top. it has to start to come down. �* . . .. the top. it has to start to come down. �*, ., ~ ., ., ., down. let's talk more about that because this _ down. let's talk more about that because this morning _ down. let's talk more about that because this morning you - down. let's talk more about that because this morning you had i down. let's talk more about that because this morning you had a l because this morning you had a meeting with all of the owners, it was in the diary anyway and the white paper came out. how has it been met with owners from league 1, is it cautiously optimistic what is there a little bit of worry about there a little bit of worry about the future? it there a little bit of worry about the future?— the future? it is cautiously optimistic. _ the future? it is cautiously optimistic. the _ the future? it is cautiously optimistic. the point - the future? it is cautiously optimistic. the point we i the future? it is cautiously i optimistic. the point we were the future? it is cautiously - optimistic. the point we were all making is it's not the process, it's the start of the process. getting it published is really important. now the conversations that need to happen can happen. until it gets that political momentum so it is really important but we cannot sit back and say we have got there we
everybody~ _ and need the money. more money helps everybody. you and need the money. more money helps eve bod . ., and need the money. more money helps eve bod. ., , , ., . everybody. you can see 'ust how much it means to — everybody. you can see 'ust how much it means to the _ everybody. you can see 'ust how much it means to the people — everybody. you can see just how much it means to the people here _ everybody. you can see just how much it means to the people here and - everybody. you can see just how much it means to the people here and it - it means to the people here and it definitely means a lot to a lady who lives locally. carol shanahan bought port vale when it was about to go bust with her husband. earlier she told me there is a lot of work still told me there is a lot of work still to be done. the point we were all making is it's not the process, it's the start of the process. getting it published is really important. now the conversations that need to happen can happen. until it gets that political momentum so it is really important but we cannot sit back and say we have got there, we need to go through the detail of it and everybody else needs to be involved in that but this brings everybody to the table and that's the important thing for me. you know the nice thing about today,
be published again. the letter was signed by 65 other mps across political parties. i�*m glad to say carolinejoins me now. can you explain what you laid out in the letter and what you want to see done about this? t the letter and what you want to see done about this?— done about this? i wrote with a u-rou done about this? i wrote with a a-rou of done about this? i wrote with a group of cross-party _ done about this? i wrote with a group of cross-party mps - done about this? i wrote with a group of cross-party mps from | done about this? i wrote with a i group of cross-party mps from all group of cross—party mps from all parties represented in parliament, to the editor of, remonstrating with her about the language used by jeremy clarkson, that it had gone through processes, editorial processes, that still saw it published, when it was clearly extremely misogynistic. the comments that advocated meghan markle be paraded through every town and land naked was just horrific, positively medieval, and i would have thought the sun could have done better than that. t the sun could have done better than that. . , ., that. i referenced the statement that. i referenced the statement that he released _ that. i referenced the statement that he released yesterday - that. i referenced the statement| that he released yesterday where that. i referenced the statement - that he released yesterday where he said he would rather put his —— he had rather put his foot in it. he was making a clumsy reference to a scene in game of thrones, he said.
pubtished this — published. a publishing organisation published this translation _ published. a publishing organisation published this translation of - published. a publishing organisation published this translation of it - published. a publishing organisation published this translation of it in - published this translation of it in the arab — published this translation of it in the arab world, _ published this translation of it in the arab world, it _ published this translation of it in the arab world, it will _ published this translation of it in the arab world, it will be - published this translation of it in the arab world, it will be bad. i published this translation of it in| the arab world, it will be bad. of the arab world, it will be bad. girl course the arab world, it will be bad. course are on the wrong one translator was murdered and another was attacked... translator was murdered and another was attacked. . ._ was attacked... yes, publisher attacked it- — was attacked... yes, publisher attacked it. but _ was attacked... yes, publisher attacked it. but definitely - was attacked... yes, publisher | attacked it. but definitely there are people. _ attacked it. but definitely there are people, secular— attacked it. but definitely there are people, secular people - attacked it. but definitely there are people, secular people in l attacked it. but definitely there i are people, secular people in the arab _ are people, secular people in the arab and — are people, secular people in the arab and muslim _ are people, secular people in the arab and muslim worlds - are people, secular people in the arab and muslim worlds who - are people, secular people in the arab and muslim worlds who are | arab and muslim worlds who are against — arab and muslim worlds who are against this— arab and muslim worlds who are against this kind _ arab and muslim worlds who are against this kind of _ arab and muslim worlds who are against this kind of crime - arab and muslim worlds who are against this kind of crime to - arab and muslim worlds who are l against this kind of crime to attack and offer— against this kind of crime to attack and offer sibley— against this kind of crime to attack and offer sibley because _ against this kind of crime to attack and offer sibley because he - and offer sibley because he expressed _ and offer sibley because he expressed himself- and offer sibley because he expressed himself in - and offer sibley because he expressed himself in a - and offer sibley because he expressed himself in a way| and offer sibley because he . expressed himself in a way or and offer sibley because he - expressed himself in a way or like that _ expressed himself in a way or like that and — expressed himself in a way or like that. and those _ expressed himself in a way or like that. and those people _ expressed himself in a way or like that. and those people actually i that. and those people actually atso, _ that. and those people actually also, there _ that. and those people actually also, there are _ that. and those people actually also, there are harassed - that. and those people actually also, there are harassed or- that. and those people actuallyi also, there are harassed or even attacked — also, there are harassed or even attacked by— also, there are harassed or even attacked by radical— also, there are harassed or even attacked by radical muslims. - also, there are harassed or even| attacked by radical muslims. and this fatwa. — attacked by radical muslims. and this fatwa. it _ attacked by radical muslims. and this fatwa, it was _ attacked by radical muslims. and this fatwa, it was about - attacked by radical muslims. and this fatwa, it was about 40 - attacked by radical muslims. and this fatwa, it was about 40 yearsi this fatwa, it was about 40 years ago _ this fatwa, it was about 40 years ago now— this fatwa, it was about 40 years ago now why— this fatwa, it was about 40 years ago now why they— this fatwa, it was about 40 years ago. now why they revived - this fatwa, it was about 40 years i ago. now why they revived it, while this government... _ ago. now why they revived it, while this government... infe— ago. now why they revived it, while this government. . .— this government... we won't know that until his _ this government... we won't know that until his trial _ this government... we won't know that until his trial if _ this government... we won't know that until his trial if we _ this government... we won't know that until his trial if we ever - this government... we won't know that until his trial if we ever knowl that until his trial if we ever know it. maria, iwas that until his trial if we ever know it. maria, i was going to quote you as of a minute or so left, and the sunday times accuse liberals of over 30 years having worked as the de facto accomplices of the ayatollah because he said they are resisting the task of dismantling speech. free
asylum seeker is in danger of his life through torture or execution, or whether he is simply an economic immigrant, someone who is trying to get here for a better life. that decision is usually made byjudges, and it is a pity that britain and france have not agreed that these poor people in france trying to cross the channel can't be dealt with by british or french judges here. but the british government, without the approval of parliament, it could have put this through parliament as a statute, how it debated, have it published, and then it would be judged debated, have it published, and then it would bejudged proof. we wouldn't have judicial review, it wouldn't have judicial review, it would be a law. but instead they didn't really have the courage to put it to parliament. they decided it was an executive government
that, and lay down pipe bombs, and there's not more publicly known at this stage and they have not been apprehended. >> i know, it's amazing. when every house has a ring doorbell cam on it, it's extraordinary to think that this person is still unidentified. but these investigations are particularly hard. if you look back at the best example, the unabomber, which took the fbi somewhere in the neighborhood of 15, maybe 17 years of investigation to ultimately identify the unabomber. that was only after he submitted a manifesto and the fbi engineered to have it published, and his brother stepped forward when he recognized it and identified him. these are very, very tough cases. there's no doubt in my mind, the bureau is doing everything they
can take a meandering walk in washington, d.c., at a time like that, and lay down pipe bombs, and there's not more publicly known at this stage and they have not been apprehended. >> i know, it's amazing. when every house has a ring doorbell cam on it, it's extraordinary to think that this person is still unidentified. but these investigations are particularly hard. if you look back at the best example, the unabomber, which took the fbi somewhere in the neighborhood of 15, maybe 17 years of investigation to ultimately identify the unabomber. that was only after he submitted a manifesto and the fbi engineered to have it published, and his brother stepped forward when he recognized it and identified him. these are very, very tough
concerns there is a lack of transparency. >> right. when i look at that database, it was simply a list of samples with sequences attached. most of which had been published, probably the vast majority by now so we knew what was in the data bases. >> if it was mostly out there and much of it published, why were they so concerned about it being hacked? >> i don't know. more importantly, people who think that that database has the covi-2. i doubt that. >> so help me god. >> congratulations, mr. president. >> and by early 2021, as one presidency ended and another began, dr. robert redfield, former head of the cdc and trump administration and a career virologiest told me this. >> i still think the most likely ideology of this pathogen in wuhan was from a laboratory, you know, escaped. >> you're now saying that when you piece it together, you think the virus probably originated in