Some pessimism over in europe. The bond rally echoing what we saw yesterday in europe. Yields down by about four basis points. Bank earnings are kicking off this morning. Beats onp reporting everything except equities and trading. Sonali they did not be dont Equities Trading, but they did beat on fixed income, so that is good. They want to be the number one Equities Trading shop, so not beating there is not a great sign. Average loan growth a little sluggish. Jamie dimon put some notes of caution in the initial statement, saying that Consumer Sentiment might be strong, but generally a lot of weakening sentiment here. In the initial statement, they dont give the outlook for Net Interest Income. However, if they revise downward once again, they already revised downward last quarter, that could be a big deal as well. Alix Net Interest Income is 14. 23 billion this last quarter. Walk us through what we did now. Billion . Ed it to 57 to 57. 5he revised it they revised it from 57. 5 billion
Attack. This is an hour. United states of america veonald j. Trump. [indiscernible] good morning. Before you get started can i just get a couple of things on theecd. Our jurisdiction w challenged by an amica. I do want to speako you more about jurisdiction, because we still have to say we have the jurisdiction. So even though you believe there is jurisdiction thespect to the collateral order docin how do you place that in line with thesplt case which specificly says in a criminal case, your jurisdiction needs to stem from the constitution or the explicit as well in atory law . We have three responses. If you look at the languageha Justice Scalia discussed, a situation er the right is one, the legal and practical value would be destroyed and these claims of absolute immuty falls within that discrimination explicitly stating that and dont have communication with anything inhe statute. I disagree. The doctrine arisees from article 2 and section 1. It is reenforced by the peachment judgmen
Attack. This is an hour. United states of america versus donald j. Tmp. [indiscernible] good morning. Before you get started can i just get a couple of things on the record. Our jurisdiction was challenged by an amica. I do want to speak to you more about jurisdiction, because we still have to say we have the jurisdiction. Sove though you belvehere is jurisdiction with respect to the collateral order doctrine, how do you place tt in line with the asphalt case which specifically says in a crimil case, your jurisdiction needs to stem from the constitution the explicit as well in statutory l . We have three responses. If you look at the language that Justice Scalia discussed, a situation where the right is one, the legal and practical value would be destroyed and these claims of absolute immunity falls within that discrimination explicitly stating that and dont have communication with ytng in the statute. Disagree. The doctrine ariseesro article 2 and section 1. It is enrced by the impeac
Just get a couple of things on the record. Our jurisdiction was challenged by an amica. I do want to speak to you more about jurisdiction, because we still have to say we have the jurisdiction. So even though you believe there is jurisdiction with respect to the collateral order doctrine, how do you place that in line with the asphalt case which specifically says in a criminal case, your jurisdiction needs to stem from the constitution or the explicit as well in statutory law . We have three responses. If you look at the language that Justice Scalia discussed, a situation where the right is one, the legal and practical value would be destroyed and these claims of absolute immunity falls within that discrimination explicitly stating that and dont have communication with anything in the statute. I disagree. The doctrine arisees from article 2 and section 1. It is reenforced by the impeachment judgment clause which refers to trial. Wallace facility is talking about a situation where the r
[indiscernible] good morning. Before you get started can just get a couple of things on the record. Our jurisdiction was challenged by an amica. I do want to speak to you more about jurisdiction, because we still have to say we have the jurisdiction. So even though you believe there is jurisdiction with respect to the collateral order doctrine, how do you place that in line with the asphalt case which specifically says in a criminal case, your jurisdiction needs to stem from the the explicit as well in statutory law . We have three responses. If you look at the language that Justice Scalia discussed, a situation where the right is anl value would be destroyed and these claims of absolute imni within that discrimination explicitly stating that and dont have communication with anything in the statute. I disagree. The doctrine arisees from ti 1. It is reenforced by the impeachment judgment clause which refers to wallace facility is talking about a situation where the right not to be tried