Law Conflicts News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

acre adams scolded officers for congregating together. >> totally unnecessary. totally petty. >> to be here on the number one late night show is also an honor we also had the remove the sippy cup. i don't spill unlike the normal host who is anything but normal. ♪ ♪ >> steve: out in ocean county, down the shore from where we are sitting right now here in i had midtown, manhattan, you have ship bottom, new jersey. it looks like 72 degrees, clear, sun is going to come up in the next hour. going for a daytime high of 84. by the way, if you are curious how many people you live in ship...

They overturned wade roe v wade. And that and were still awaiting the new york trial judges decision on whether to hold the former president in Contempt Of Court for violating the gag order. And President Biden signing the bill sending weapons to ukraine and israel, what could be a ban on tiktok if its chinese owner doesnt sell. Good day everyone. Im Andrea Mitchell. The Supreme Court just two blocks from here just concluded its Oral Arguments that could decide when doctors can provide Emergency Abortions and other medical care in states with severely restrictive bans like idaho. The potential...

Simultaneously, of course, understanding what the state has done here is essentially try to abrogate its role in creating an undue burden on women to private attorneys general, these vigilante citizens who don't even have to claim any personal harm in order to bring the suit. >> well, i mean, jeff, just the timing of this, how long do you think a lawsuit like this might take to make its way through the legal system? >> well, quite some time and that's what is so outrageous about this situation and frankly the responsibility is principally with the supreme court of the united states, which last...

Last week let this law go into effect without having a constitutional challenge. i mean even the state of texas acknowledges that this law conflicts with binding supreme court precedent, roe v. wade in 1973, the casey decision in 1992. no question that this law conflicts with the laws -- the law of the land as we think it exists. but by -- the supreme court in letting this go into effect has created this completely bizarre situation where a plainly unconstitutional law is now in effect and now denying women their rights in texas. and there is no court at this moment evaluating whether it's con...

Give us the grounds for your decision. why did you do it? >> well, because we can. as a charter city in california, we have the ability to interpret law and to implement them in our city. we just think the state was completely off on this. we think this issue is something maintained and managed by the u.s. government and we decide to enable ourselves -- >> bill: what do you -- what are you concerned about? lay that out for us. >> i guess first of all, when they passed the sanctuary law, this law conflicts directly with my oath of office as a mayor, city council member and u.s. navy veteran to ...