Are the chances the oligarchs are going to keep bowing down, especially given the signals . So it doesnt matter who owns it. Youre not going to get putin. You see my point. I think there are two positive possible outcomes to sanctions, in addition to a range of negatives but lets talk about positive. Positive hospital outcomes to sanctions. One is that we will set them against each other. I would imagine that the u. S. Government and talking about sanctions thought this was a positive thing. Instead of having stable, unified leadership, why dont we start it up and see what happens . So there is that, that it will decrease the stability of putins hold on power. I think that that is regarded by those governments that have gone through with the sanctions as positive. Theres also a second, maybe this is just a fanciful positive outcome, in the book i talk a lot about the ideas of the transition from authoritarian to democratic regime and how you need to great and incentives for the rule of
Of course not. It is always the womans fault. We use men and then look at the consequences. I have some leftover borscht. What some . If you dont like that we get to the shop down the road and get an accord before pastrami sandwich. Grandma, i think of going to marry his corrupt. In my dream she would come up to me and gently put aside and look at me so closely connected smell of baby powder honors well, if you love her palette that is the important thing. She has a little tuzla and could see a good food. Is she bought . No perris her hair is black. She is chinese. It does not matter. Grandma would go along fine. All of the world will be brown one day. Just love her. All will be well. Here samos the balls. I forgot, you know like to buy there. Enter kind and wispy strands of ashen hair would fade back into the night along with my dreams and the breeze of the South China Sea to. [applause] this weekend on the cspan networks tonight at 8 00 p. M. Eastern, a town hall meeting on the Media
A form frequent my misunderstood in application, listeners are prone to application of its precise meaning due to its very familiarity. Its impre session carries the risk it will be honored in name only. Thats the problem. Were not transparent enough, we dont understand it enough were not consistent enough, and what proproportionallity does is both serve as an empowering, affirmative principle to say this is perfectly permissible up to these bounds and, therefore, anything within the bounds, why top short of that . Often politics or tactics or perceptions. All kind of reasons. The point is, and one of the could goes of the book, is to say, where proportionality applies, let that constraint but its not artificially inject it. Then we can have the debate about what the right end result or desired end result is and what are the true constraints. Sometimes it is just poll fixess or just perception or allies or the end state, sometimes it may be history. But we need to be clear about what i