And they count find themselves having difficulty down the line later on because of the numbers as you said, they work in his favor if it is him. the rnc is trying, i think a couple things. that s a really interesting point about liz cheney, are they trying to make sure liz cheney doesn t make it on the deb state stage and create party unity where the biggest challenge of party unity is often donald trump. sununu said something else that s really interesting recently and it was that it s not about the number of candidates who enter the race. it s the number it s about knowing when to get out. to make sure that perhaps someone like donald trump is not the nominee. right. this is, again, an early weekend. it s march but the maneuvering is getting interesting. up next t for us live to ukraine. russian troops closing in on bakhmut fromom three sides. president putin wants the battle field win and d appears willingo pay a giant price. withth freight brokerage to transnsportation management, truckload capacity and dedicated trucks and drivers.
Canad can t stop this vote. it will happen on wednesday a vote to approve this disapproval resolution that went through the house last month to essentially recement the d.c. criminal code simply because the chairman of the d.c. city counsel doesn t want this vote to happen and wants to withdraw the legislation which was noted without precedent will not frost the senate from acting here, his move caught a lot of people by surprise and send leadership aids scrambling because this is something that they have not really heard of before and trying to assert whether or not this has real emp implications. we re headed to a lopsided vote in the senate after biden did come out in support of resending this law despite the white house saying it was opposed to this republican led effort to resend the law when 173 house democrats voted for it last month. last week, joe biden changed his mind and said he would allow this to go forward and now we
Executive privilege and immunity from subpoenas. and yet, cheney said, it was time for pat cipollone to come forward. so many witnesses have talked about how he was trying to keep trump and his gang from the lawless illegal potentially, unconstitutional certainly, activities, and he should come forward and tell the american people what happened. liz cheney doesn t say anything by accident. that was a complete call-out of pat cipollone, who my sources have been telling me for months was a critical witness, and who i believe the committee thought for a long time was going to show up and cooperate. so something happened along the way in the last couple weeks that changed that. and she was going public. she didn t have to do that today at this hearing. she wanted to be on the record saying that this one hid behind
Thank got it was the c team and not the b team. i think that s the issue you have here. i wonder if they didn t go out forward and have those ridiculous lawsuits if they would have run deeper and darker what would have happened. that s what scares me. the issue we have is multiple layers were involved from top to bottom. i think as the committee goes forward when we look at the second, third and fourth layers, but beneath that top tier, when you see the cascading effects and people pushing this, whether through fund-raising or things of that nature, it should scare the hell out of people. the committee laid out, and it was very clear, all this emotional testimony today. but they also made it clear they want to hear from other witnesses, including former white house counsel pat cipollone. liz cheney doesn t say anything by accident. she really called out pat cipollone. my sources have told me that pat cipollone behind the scenes was
Or inaction, corruptly seek to obstruct or impede congress official proceedings to count electoral votes? we know that for 187 minutes, president trump refused to act. and he refused to act when his action was required. it was essential. and it was compelled by his duty, compelled by his oath of office. liz cheney, she s not being shy, joyce. it sure sounds like to me she s laying the groundwork for potential criminal charges against donald trump, specifically 18 usc 1512, the federal obstruction statute. do you think we re going to see a prosecution under that? and do you think he s going to see a subpoena? liz cheney doesn t have the ability to make decisions about prosecuting. but in this day and age, she has something that s perhaps a bit more important. she has a public bully pulpit. she has the ability to gather