Stay updated with breaking news from Ofall congress. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
bill wasn't so. you've laid it out perfectly, ee which is that when people sendnn with a vote or send members of congress to washingtongtct the,s they expect them to do the people's business, not to be day trading on the stockbe market, not to be using fro the information that they get briees whfings to go and makm a quick buck on wall street. so here's what my bill does. it says, no more trading ofgres. stocks, but members of congress, in fact, no stock more ownership of stocks than s bys of conmembers of congressi if you want to save, fine, put it in a mutual fund. do.e mosket americans do. but nancy pelosi is the perfectc example of what should not be happening in d.c., whichc, is people getting rich on the stock market off ofw information they know because they're a member of congress. >>use they are a and pelosi wasd between one million and five million in stockstraded for semiconductors only days before congress allocatedlion in 50 mo to the industry. >> a m i right on that, right senator ? o that's the report, shawn. s the. and there's lots of reports lot like that with her with her family and other members ofon congress. i mean, this is a problegress. thm that go has been going on for years.is a and she is just a perfec pt e
example of how ricxah people can get by using their information. listen, insider tradinn get by . is already illegal. and we're talking here about abe members of congress. the briefingrss that they get, the information that we havee from hearings. from hearings. that mostt have americans don't have because, of course, that's why they sentt us to congress's why to donot tt their business, not to turn richfaround and to get rich of a . that's why i calact.l it the pelosi now act. we need to act right now.. you know, i don't like the ideam of term limits because i would like to think we're a freee society. but i think over time it's a bad idea probably whose time has come because people get entrenched in the swamp over time.if p and if people justeopl go serveo and go home, i think they'd to o be more inclined to do the people's business. when we he issues that comes up whenever we talk about this is whether or not you want bli to put money in a blind trust.nd i'm not sure if i even trustecam that because somebody thatebhey they know is running the blind d trust and they could whisper i n want tr of that person, you may
district. so my question is , okay, let. me be very clear and respectful. to you. you as k mewh a question. answe when i answerer d. it's the answer to your question. you don't get to determine whether i answer your question rmine whor. okay, in all respect, thankcts. you. no, no, let's answer her her q question. you just raised the question. uen. .i will be very clear with you.t the intel committeete is different. you know why? becauswhatn the it happens in tl committee. you don't know what happens in the intel committee. u don't knwhat happensthother sn the world. other members of congress don'td know. what did adaasm schiff do with the chairman of the intel committee? rman of the intel commitwhat ads power as a chairman and lie amea to the american public. even the inspector general said it.n inspecto andot be like democrats and play politics with these where they removed republicans from committees and all committees. so, yes, he can serve on a committee, but he will not ser serve on intel because it goesve to the national security goe ofy america. and i will always put them firs, first. all right. and if you want to talk aboutsw
so, because of her pastd anti anti-semitic remarks, including that tweet-s right there. ght t. israel has hypnotized the world. may allah awakenypnotize the peh and help them see the evil doings of israel.ngs of israel democrats actually backed a resolution condemning her s bay of anti-semitism. but now but now they're bashing republicans for daring to remove her from the foreign not affairs committee, not a committee. she should be on. ful if democrats wanted fullcont control over their members committee assignments, the memhv they shouldn't have banned republicans from committees during the last congress . precedent now t they set the precedent,he the precedent. now they want to whine want and cry and act like and complain and cry and act like a victim. pretty disgusting. time to grow u disgustp. spare the country the drama instead. maybe send mccarthy a than kte by note, but keeping our country safe by removing these twong from the intel committee. it was more the author of the new book, start stay or leave the art of, decision making, trey gowdy. also foxe ar news contributorar jason chaffetz. jason , we'll start with you.th well, if i you.f they didn't lie
dirty dossier that hillaryplica. for being used, then we have 2020. yo we have 2020.u have a young h who wrote a thesis about how trump and russia colluded in 2016 setting up fbi agents to meet with big tech companies once a week and tell them and warning them all you'reto b going to be fed misinformationfe and may even be about hunter because they had the hunter biden laptop since december. unte2019. fbi t do we need the fbi to be disbanded and do we needop to start again? >> you need to lop off the head of that organization. if you don't get rid of the senior management and the people that are running counte r intelligence and some of thesegn washington based issues, theno you're going to continue ro to have problems. director wray wablems. ctor wray was put in place to be an agent of change. not he has not been, i think the twitter files will reveal, i think that so-called churchn commission that jim jordan is going to head up with some very serious members of congress who actually want to dove into the political ization of the fbi.
they have been exposed. in fact, swalwell wants yo u to believe that these words aree putting his life at risk.. and schiff thinks congress has been degraded. >> take a look. hypocrisy is probably the least of mr. mccarthy since the most significant impact is that he is continuing this destructive trend set by his party leaderis of tearing down our institutions, of degrading the congress. thisinutions, is purely about political vengeance. the cost is not only removing litical vengeance.lyus from thee on the intelligence committee. the cost is not only breakinlli shattering the most precious glassware in the cabinet , a committee that's always beeneh bipartisan. the costs are the death threatas that miss ohmar, myself and mr. schiff keep gettind g because mc mccarthy continues to aimon t and project these smears against us , even though we have said publicly these smears. are bringing death threats, heoo continues to do it, which makest us believe that there's an in intent behind it.
this practice, why why didey they institute it in the lastwel congress? and we're all the the where was the nation from?t and others >> swalwell and schiff and others. yeah. >> n, nancy pelosi started this, but that was speaker mccarthy at his best. he's talking from his heart. he's putting the interests of the nation above those twoe individuals. . look, adam schiff and eric swalwell, they would not pass a security clearance to be the crossing guard at your local school. le clearanct alone be one of the mt important intelligence oversight people int oversightnt . there are hundreds of democrats that are more qualified to serve on that committee. and , sean, there used to beu hm a time where you had term limits. first of all, there shouldr be term limits for all ofall congress, but term limitofterm s on how long you serve in thatmmo committee so that you don't reveal this intelligence y thisn and you don't get compromised like eric swalwell is obviously as was briefed by the fbi, you know, and you know, trey,ssue i look at the issue of jim jordan and jim banks taken off the jan six committee at
swalwell, let's talk about swalwell, because you have not had the briefing that i had. i had the briefing and nancye be pelosi had the briefing fromfbi. the fbi. the fbi never came before this r congress to tell the leadership of this congress thatdershi eric swalwelpl had a problemchip with a chinese spy until he served on intel. are so it wasn't just us who were concerned about the fbi, wasmemr concerned about putting oe inte a member of congressl co on the intel committeemmit thats the rights to see things that others don't because of his knowledge and relationship with a chinese spy. >> but youchinese spy. know wha thosvoe voters elected shift,m f even though he lied, those elected swalwell even even thoh though he lied to the american public to . so, you know ho , i'll respect his voters, too, and they'll serve on committees. bue ont they will not serve on a place that has national security relevance. at natbecause integrity matters to me. >> that's the answer to yourr ty question. our questionall right. that's how that's how to battles needleup ht media mob. now, needless to sayss, schiff and swalwell not happy that