Stay updated with breaking news from Opus tower. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
the latest trump opus, this is his tweet this morning, showing himself body slamming superimposed cnn back when he was a character on wwe. as somebody who's had more than a few tv fights on his show, what did you make of that moment? >> well, the point is what i would think any grown up's reaction would be, that's show business. it doesn't belong in the white house. i don't think trump has any feeling about the dignity and sacredness of where he is. this is the most powerful, most sacred job in america, most powerful job in the world. when you're there, you don't behave like you're on a tv reality show, you don't behave like you're on wwe. i have been on wwe. but it would never dawn on me that oh my gosh, this is how you behave in the white house. you could take any guest i ever
could they have last year? were they putting malware in there so they could do it in the future if they want to? that was on wednesday. now, today there's this from the washington post. this opus which among many other things lays out the concern by the obama administration that if the -- if they had retaliated for the russian attack, russia might do something to our election that's far worse than what they've done already. they were worried about that because apparently they believe that the russians could have blown up our election if they wanted to. joining us now is ellen, she's national security reporter for the washington post, one of the reporters who wrote this blockbuster piece today. congratulations on this opus today. it's a real achievement. thanks for being here. >> thank you. >> so one key piece of your reporting, and this is a complex piece, is that the obama administration was very worried as to what the russians might do
systems, our election systems that will allow them easier access next time? no comment. we are all delighted that whatever the russians were doing messing around in the voting systems of more than 20 states last year, at least they didn't blow things up on election day as far as we can tell. but could they? could they have last year? i mean were they putting malware in there so they could do it in the future if they want to? that was on wednesday. now today there's this from "the washington post." this opus which among many other things lays out the concern by the obama administration that if they had retaliated against russia for the russian attack before our election, russia might do something to our election that's far worse than what they have done already. they were worried about that because apparently they believed that the russians could have blown up our election if they wanted to. joining us now is ellen nakashima, one of the reporters who wrote this blockbuster piece
put malware or back doors or anything else in our computer systems, our election systems, that allow them easier access next time? no comment. we are all delighted that whatever the russians were doing messing around in the voting systems of more than 20 states last year, at least they didn't blow things up on election day, as far as we can tell. but could they? could they have last year? i mean, were they putting malware in there so they could do it in the future if they want to? that was on wednesday. today there is this from the "washington post," this opus, which, among other things, lays out the concern from the obama administration that if they had retaliated against russia for the russian attack before our election, russia might do something to our election that's far worse than what they've done already. they were worried about that because apparently they believe that the russians could have blown up our election if they wanted to. joining us now is ellen
>> would you ever like to watch the super bowl super bowl with bill o'reilly? >> yeah, oh, my goodness, i would love that! >> would you like to sit in between trump and bill o'reilly and watch the super bowl altogether? >> i actually would. i think those two would be a really good time. >> we are the three best friends that anybody could have. you know who i am? i am watters. watters. and this is my world. >> nice. this is pretty much the worst video ever married. >> bill: watters joins us from houston, texas. what are you doing down there? annoying people? >> that is what i usually do. we will head the party circuit hard the next couple of days. there is a maxim party, leather and lace party, rolling stone party, i will ask these athletes and celebrities about trump and football, the two most important topics of the day. >> bill: and you will run not on your opus saturday nights at 8:00? that's where we will see it?
>> who is going to win the game? >> should i take that to the bank? >> probably not. >> was the matter withl you? >> would you ever like to watch the super bowl with bill o'reilly? >> yeah, oh, my goodness, i would love that! >> would you like to sit in between trump and bill o'reilly and watch the super bowl altogether? >> i actually would. i think those two would be a really good time. >> ♪ we are the three best friends that anybody could have ♪ >> you know who i am? i am watters. watters. and this is my world. >> nice. this is pretty much the worst video ever made. >> bill: watters joins us from houston, texas. what are you doing down there? annoying people? >> that is what i usually do. we will hit the party circuits. hard the next couple of days. there is a "maxim" party, leather and lace party, "rolling stone" party, i will ask these athletes and celebrities about trump and football, the two most important topics of the day. >> bill: and you will run that on your opus saturday nights at 8:00? that's where we will see it? >> yes, you will see it saturday
everything we have outlined and especially in this four-hour opus from mr. putin, what's this about? is it posturing or more than that? >> i think they're both sending messages yesterday -- i think it was yesterday donald trump had this phrase, it was very interesting, he said this is like a little dance and it was about bargaining companies, boeing and another company on building a new military jet but what he's saying is this is a little dance. in other words i think there's a pattern which is incoming president trump makes a statement, kind of over the top, it's his first valuely, he waits probably for some type of response but the problem here -- that could be good bargaining if you're buying a rug at a market or something, at a bazaar. but when you're talking about nuclear weapons, what that says
time for our small biz tools. we asked our viewers to send the most helpful websites and apps and technology so you can give them a try. >> so one website i use consistently in my practice is called my case. my case is a law firm management website, it is completely cloud based and allows me to manage documents for my law firm, billing for my clients as well as production and resource development for my client. >> one app that has been helpful for me running my business is called opus. it is a calendar and planner with notes. it is helpful if you have an iphone or android. >> we use a tool called intercom. it is a chat feature that we embed on our website. and we can get real time updates and questions and inbound inquiries from potential partners and clients. it goes to all of the cell phones of all of the guys on the team should we want. we can interact with users we have on boarded to send out bound e-mails, automate updates as they hit certain milestones through our platform and get
everything they've ever thought or reported against donald trump. they say that they hope that this opus from them will be his political obituary. it takes up -- i mean, i've never seen anything like this. and from the cover, i mean, they're not just calling for his defeat, they're calling for a landslide destruction of him. now, i can also report exclusively that on monday the "new yorker" magazine is going to publish their own epic statement of condemnation for trump and support of hillary clinton. the newsy nonfeature part of the magazine is called talk of the town. it usually consists of four or five pieces of news on culture and politics and art. but this is the cover of it we can show you. they have given over the entire section of the talk of the town to one big, long article on their feelings about trump and their feelings about clinton. and they denounce trump with all of the fervor that almost every
newspapers and magazines are having to get creative in order to try to stand out among the crowd as they endorse hillary clinton and come out against donald trump. did you see this today? the "new york daily news" they did not just reiterate their endorsement of hillary clinton today. they decided to write a 14-chapter long, multi-thousand word indictment of donald trump. i brought the physical paper so you can get a grasp of this. i want you to see all the pages it takes up in the paper. it's here on the front, "bury trump in a landslide," then on all of these other pages. look, this is where they start. they basically -- wait, there's more. oh, wait, there's more. i mean, they basically unload everything they've ever thought or reported against donald trump. they say that they hope that this opus from them will be his political obituary. it takes up -- i mean, i've never seen anything like this. and from the cover, i mean,