Protecting Sources News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

and suspicious network of companies used to enrich the biden family by more than $10 million. this comes as the g.o.p. presses the fbi for a document that supposedly details a whistleblower's claim that then vice president biden sold his influence for money a document that no one has seen as of yet. the fbi, however, is now responding correspondent david spunt starts us off tonight from the justice department. good evening, david. >> good evening, bret. we know right now that republicans are calling this judgment day for president biden and his family using bank records. they say the...

hours after a redacted copy of the affidavit was unsealed. it's not proof of the time, instead it represents the doj is believed that it has probable cause that a trump has been committed. trump's legal team filed a document late last night, to get a special master -- the editorial boards of major newspapers, the railway in. we've got the new york times editorial saying donald trump is not above the law. the washington post editorial board says the trump affidavit shows the mar-a-lago search was hardly capricious. the wall street journal editorial board as, the mar-a-lago affidavit, ...

Veteran reporter Catherine Herridge testifies before Congress in support of a bill to protect journalists and their confidential sources.

Evidence that payments were then funneled from robinson walker to the biden family. if it looks and sounds complicated it was intentionally made to be complicated. >> did not share any evidence that any payments went directly into the pockets of joe biden. the white house, fighting back, spokesman ian sam's tweeting comer has asked for a single joe biden policy they believe has been unduly influenced. he cannot name a single one, incredible. also on capitol hill, the fbi missed a noon deadline to turn over what republicans claim is a document that may show then vice president biden accepted mo...

Their classification system. all that's required to pursue a charge under the espionage act is to have information that is relevant and sensitive to the national defense. surely, the information that was found or recovered here could fit that bill regardless of whether or not it's classified information. they went to great lengths to distinguish between information that's classified and information that's about the national defense. the two are not necessarily come sensitive, or have to be for the purposes of. this >> when we look at it, there's a lot of redactions there. has it successfully p...