Page 5 - Record Center News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Maybe she would have stood by them, but well never know. So, mr. President , it is for these reasons i regrettably cannot support her nomination. Ms. Saldana, as i said, is somebody who i admire and respect, but if she is determined to help the president implement this deeply flawed executive action and refuse to enforce the law that congress has written and has been signed by previous president s, i cant support her nomination. I will not aid and abet a president dead set on unilaterally defying our nations immigration laws. Mr. President , i yield the floor. The presiding officer the senator...

I am ok with the president making a goodfaith belief. Im ok with that. I think the fact here is one of bad faith. The reason why the president s statement is relevant is not the political theater. It is a statement he says he was asked, and he said no. The Justice Department said, this cant happen. Suddenly, you lose up already. I think it is bad faith. We are in uncharted waters. You will find that theres not much written on the take care clause. That is why the separation of powers trumps the Immigration Law when it goes too far. These provisions grant discretion, but to grant the amount of ...

Hasnt been appreciated says we need notice in common. We need rule making. How is this working . I think this hearing is why. We dont know how this policy works. In my research, i find a checklist used by dhs which has no other box. By checking off a box. Professor found some narrative form which is slightly different. Admitted in the testimony there were different types being used. This would be a perfect opportunity to take the time to show to the American People, how is this working . Show us whats happening and then we can go to court. I think theres one aspect of judge hainans opinion is ...

Good morning. The Judiciary Committee will come to order, and without objection the chair is authorized to declare recesses of the committee at any time. We welcome everyone to this mornings hearing on the unconstitutionality of president obamas executive actions on immigration, and ill begin by recognizing myself for an opening statement. Last november president obama announced one of the biggest constitutional power grabs ever by a president. He declared unilaterally that by his own estimation almost 5 million unlawful aliens would be free from the legal consequences of their lawless actions...

These regulations, by the way were adopted through notice and comment procedures and they do have the force of law. None of these laws not one of them, says or even remotely implies that deferred action is per se illegal. The most vocal critics have misunderstood what deferred action is. Theyve confused deferred action itself with certain things that you can apply for if you get deferred action. But deferred action itself is just one form of prosecutorial discretion. Its a decision not to prioritize a persons removal, at least for the moment and the only thing affirmative about it is that the ...