Recusal Rules News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Counsel jack smith. The 45page indictment accuses the former e president of three counts of conspiracy and one count of obstruction for his alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Culminating in the january 6th attacks on the u. S. Capitol. Heres the Special Counsel tuesday after the charges were handed up. The attack on our nations capitol on january 6th, 20211, was an unprecedented assault on the seat of american democracy. As described in the indictment, it was fueled by lies. If lies by the defendant targeted at obstructing a Bedrock Function of the u. S. Government, ...

supreme court, that donald trump is constitutionally disqualified from being on the ballot in the ste primary. the opinion pulls no punches. quote, president trump incited and encouraged the use of violence and lawless action to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power. the tenor of president trump's messages to hisupporters in exshorting him to -- had an option to fight back. the cavalry was coming to find. here's where the colorado state supreme court went further, reversing the lower court's finding that donald trump doesn't qualify as a, quote, ofce under section 3 of the 14th amen...

simply saying we have no more shelters, spaces or resources. and new york city mayor eric adams blaming both sides in washington for the crisis. >> it is the irresponsibility of the republican party in washington for refusing to do the real immigration reform, and it's the irresponsibility of the white house for not addressing this problem. paul: let's bring in our panel, columnists dan dan henninger kim strassel and editorial board member kyle peterson. so, dan, what kind of a surge do we expect? is it going to be a big one? >> yeah, it will be a big one. and it's been big. might be...

Don't impose your own ethics code, we will impose one on you with, and that includes recusal rules. so let's say they pass something like that. that would then, presumably, be adjudicated, if it were challenged, and until go up to the supreme court, i assume. >> yes. it would be an awkward matter to adjudicate. but the supreme court would be within its authority to adjudicate it because it is a law passed by congress, and it is the, it is -- there is a constitutional question here. and i suspect what they would end up doing, and this is pure peculation based on nothing than nothing that justic...

It's not really defined, that seems like a pretty broad phase to -- phrase to me. and then those complaints would get vetted and go to the a panel of circuit court judges for review. it seems to me almost like an open-ended rolling impeachment process at -- paul: it'd be open political season on the court anytime they issued an opinion that people didn't like. >> and similar to the recusal system. so the white house bill has a forced, congressionally-enforced recusal rules. republican witnesses were saying that basically what you'd end up in any real big case was pre-litigation over which of t...