Permission for an abortion. in 1990 when the justices said teens must be allowed to get a judicial bypass on parental consent rules. then in 1992's planned parenthood v. casey, this was a big case. webster was the precursor to casey saying that the privacy standards should shift to whether the law places an undue burden on the woman or put in place substantial obstacles in the way of obtaining an abortion. you see, roe v. wade has not stood absolute. it has been eroded. this loose definition of what is undue or substantial provides an opening for more conservative justice, and given that most ...