Page 32 - Section 230 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Lawsuit: Reddit Allowed Man to Repeatedly Post Underage Revenge Porn 26 Apr 2021 Reddit, the self-proclaimed front page of the internet, is being sued by a woman for allegedly allowing an ex-boyfriend to repeatedly post revenge porn of her filmed when she was just 16 years old. The Verge reports that Reddit is being sued by a woman for allegedly allowing an ex-boyfriend to repeatedly post pornographic images of has a 16-year-old. The lawsuit applies measures instituted in 2018 under FOSTA-SESTA to Reddit which has previously drawn fire for child sexualization problems. The woman, identified ...

Updated: April 21, 2021 11:47 IST In March, Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg called for a Section 230 reform that would give publishers immunity only if they follow best practices for removing damagingmaterial from their platforms Share Article AAA Blumenthal noted that Republican Senator Ted Cruz, who is also on the committee, has also called for Section 230 to be reformed.   | Photo Credit: AFP In March, Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg called for a Section 230 reform that would give publishers immunity only if they follow best practices for removing damagingmaterial from t...

  The federal government shoveling money to private road owners – is yet another instance of massive cronyism.  Private road owners toll We the Drivers.  And then We the Drivers are taxed even more – to shovel the private road owners crony “infrastructure” money. And government roads?  Interstate 95 goes north-to-south from Maine to Florida through fifteen states and the District of Columbia – more states than any other US highway.  But why should We the Drivers in the thirty-five states in which I-95 does not exist – be taxed to pay for it? Biden, Inc was (is?) very stupidly...

Mon, Apr 5th 2021 10:38am — Mike Masnick Today was a weird one for Justice Thomas. Along with his bizarre and confusing dissent in the Oracle/Google case, he has done another one of his random walks down conspiracy theory nonsense lane on an unbriefed issue in which he gets to, once again, attack the 1st Amendment. He's done this a few times now. Two years ago he did this in writing an unprovoked attack on the 1st Amendment regarding NY Times v. Sullivan. Last year, he did it with an unprovoked and bizarre attack on Section 230. And now he's done it again.

This article is part of the Free Speech Project, a collaboration between Future Tense and the Tech, Law, & Security Program at American University Washington College of Law that examines the ways technology is influencing how we think about speech. On Monday morning, Justice Clarence Thomas all but endorsed a fringe legal theory that would sharply limit social media companies’ ability to moderate content on their own platforms, stripping them of their own First Amendment rights to dissociate with speech they dislike. This radical idea has no basis in the Supreme Court’s constituti...