CSPAN3 Politics And Public Policy Today April 28, 2016
That its relatively uninvasive . If i may answer that question. I think for dissipation for search purposes, my understanding of that doctrine is one is concerned with the suspect doing something affirmatively to get rid of the evidence, flushing the evidence down the toilet. Thats the classic situation. The court in mcnealy made very clear were not dealing with that. The alcohol, with blood tests, breath tests, is going to dissipate at a predictable level. Its going to remain in the body to be test later on. I dont think it its simply created from an entirely different category of evidence as...