Live Breaking News & Updates on State jurisdiction
Stay updated with breaking news from State jurisdiction. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
India News: Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal, led by BJP and TMC, collaborate in the Supreme Court to advocate for state jurisdiction in the liquor industry, challen
meadows and zachary clark attorneys will appear. and so, there are various episodes in which mark meadows is a first-hand player in this conspiracy to overturn the ele election, and influencing an election result is not a state jurisdiction, but federal jurisdiction, and two bold-faced names have less than 24 hours to surrender to the fulton county jail, and so later today, we will see the former president donald trump here in atlanta to surrender, and that is a lot of activity at the jailhouse later, and mark med dose and jeffrey clark, we will see what they do in the next 24 hours.
in every way. i don't see how this case can be resolved before the election. i think it will be one of the last ones that will be resolved. and quite frankly, i think the state prosecutor in georgia should have deferred to jack smith and the special counsel as they had investigated and pursued the indictment surrounding january 6th. that from my experience is what ordinarily happens whenever you have overlapping federal jurisdiction and state jurisdiction, the federal jurisdiction usually is deferred to by the state prosecutor. >> so you agree with chris christie because he has said similar basically, that he thinks the state should have deferred, especially since that other indictment from jack smith came first. but given that you're saying that, you are a former federal prosecutor. i mean, you've worked on this. you've pursued racketeering charges in the past. so what did you make of district attorney fani willis's application of what's known as these rico charges and how this case was ultimately put
in every way. i don't see how this case can be resolved before the election. i think it will be one of the last ones that will be resolved, quite frankly, i think the state prosecutor in georgia should've deferred to jack smith and the special counsel as they investigated and pursue the indictment surrounding january 6th. that, from my experience, is what ordinarily happens whenever you have overlapping federal jurisdiction, state jurisdiction, the federal jurisdiction usually is deferred to by the state prosecutor. >> so, you agree with chris christie? because he has said similar basically, that he thinks the station of deferred, especially since that other indictment from jack smith became first. but given that you're saying you are a former federal prosecutor, you worked on this, you've pursued racketeering charges in the past. so, what do you make of district attorney fani willis's application what's known as these rico charges and how this
removal statute. here is why. the law is that you can only remove a case, the supreme court has held with nixon v. fitzgerald, you can only take -- fani willis talked about this eloquently enough press conference, state elections, state jurisdiction to protect democracy, we don't let -- it only if they're it's within the outer perimeter, a quote from the supreme court, of their official duties. how is a political candidate staging an attempted coup within the constitutional job description of our presidents official duties? i will see david's 11th circuit case, the federal jurisdiction with a controlling case. malcolm the martin, which says an officer who acts out of any personal interest, check, malice, check, actual criminal intent, check. or for any other reason to do his duty, no removal. this case trump will try, david
would have to sort out so it raises all these questions. what are the other questions i had as what's the advantage here? why would somebody want to move their case to a federal court? there really is no advantage here, and i think you know i don't want to divine what the motives of a member of congress was. but you know, a lot of this is simply responding to one case involving the former president. there simply is no advantage here, and we have a long tradition in this country going back frankly, to the 10th amendment, which lays out the fact that states overseas state law and matters of state jurisdiction and even taking the former president trump former president trump's matter. it is distinct regardless of what you think of the merits of the lawsuit or of the prosecution. it is a distinct state law matter happening in st state court by a former resident of new york who chose to do business there. that's very straightforward. nothing really is changed by moving things into
keep native children with native families. it is kind of a guardrails to make sure that those systemic removals that happen generation before snow top in again. there are some states that have a state version of icwa, but it will be kind of like abortion. if it falls. it will depend on where the native family lives, and whether they have those protections. >> like roe, if it falls it falls under state jurisdiction. why would it be like that? >> because a lot of child welfare experts have recognized that icwa is a best practice, a lot of states actually -- the irony of texas saying that it violates what states rights is that there were 23 states who say that aqua was -- with this lawsuit. and many states have basically adopted icwa into the child welfare policies. what we go away would be the federal. lob and we should have a decision from the supreme by
for governor, 22 of 36 republican candidates, and in the u.s. senate, 19 of 35 republican candidates. scott, is it a larger institutional problem now, in the republican party? >> i do think that there are a lot of people who believe that the 2020 election was not fairly contested. i'm not one of them. i believe that it basically was fairly contested and that joe biden won, but you're absolutely right. it is a widespread belief. it's not a correct belief, but it is a widespread belief. i think at the end of the day, the correct message for the republicans ought to be that everybody who's a legal voter should be able to vote. all votes should be counted fairly and in a timely fashion. and all the laws that are applicable in my state jurisdiction should be followed and executed to the best of the ability of the people who are on the ground and sworn in to execute those laws. it's a -- you know, easy to vote, hard to cheat. it is a basic message that a lot of republicans used, but they all should use it. and to me, it's the correct one
barriers to prevent people from entering the united states. >> martha: governor abbott with a lot on his happened. when you listen to the breakdown of who controls the border there, some areas are local jurisdiction. some are texas state jurisdiction, some are federal jurisdiction and absolutely no cohesive policy by the federal government to control the border of the country in terms of who is coming in and out. we have record numbers this year, record numbers of people crossing that border and interactions with the border patrol that has become increasingly under pressure and less and less supported in the ability to do their job. let's bring in chad wolf, former department of homeland security acting secretary and katie pavlich, fox news contributor. welcome to you both. what a horrific situation. 53 people lost their lives trying to get into this country in the back of a truck that they were abandoned by someone that
The newsletter serves as a forum to discuss a range of legal and policy developments of interest to our clients, colleagues, and friends across Indian Country. Please contact our attorneys or public policy professionals with any questions, and please send us your feedback!