Live Breaking News & Updates on Support of

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Support of on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Support of and stay connected to the pulse of your community

FOX and Friends Sunday

trump, 82 president, dun. right? -- done. 63% for haley, mind made up in support of, could be persuaded for those two candidates still in the 30s. pete: that's interesting. and then it come down to organization and turnout. so if your mind is made up, are you more enthusiastic? i don't know. it's going to be on these campaigns to pull those people out -- rachel: when you go to the caucus, pete, are you just there to -- because i've never been to one. are you just there to vote or are there people trying to persuade you last minute? like -- pete: it's different than a polling place which is run by the government, and so you're not supposed to be campaigning at the polling place. this is run by the republican party. so you can show up with your candidate's t-shirt, walk up to your neighborhood and be, like, yo, change that vote is. a vote for vivek is not a vote for trump. you can do all that at the caucus site. rachel: which explains the

Pete , Trump , Candidates , Mind , President , Got-nikki-haley , Support-of , Dun , Two , 30 , 82 , 63

The Context

also plenteous in— him and some understand that it is also plenteous in support - him and some understand that it is also plenteous in support of - also plenteous in support of immediate _ also plenteous in support of immediate family— also plenteous in support of immediate family and - also plenteous in support of immediate family and his i also plenteous in support of - immediate family and his friends in the community— immediate family and his friends in the community in— immediate family and his friends in the community in the _ immediate family and his friends in the community in the northeast - immediate family and his friends in the community in the northeast ofl the community in the northeast of england _ the community in the northeast of england has— the community in the northeast of england has the _ the community in the northeast of england has the backing _ the community in the northeast of england has the backing with - the community in the northeast of england has the backing with his. england has the backing with his lawyer after _ england has the backing with his lawyer after the _ england has the backing with his lawyer after the judgment- england has the backing with his lawyer after the judgment was . lawyer after the judgment was delivered _ lawyer after the judgment was delivered. one _ lawyer after the judgment was delivered. one thing - lawyer after the judgment was delivered. one thing that - lawyer after the judgment was . delivered. one thing that makes lawyer after the judgment was - delivered. one thing that makes me uneasy— delivered. one thing that makes me uneasy is— delivered. one thing that makes me uneasy is that — delivered. one thing that makes me uneasy is that in _ delivered. one thing that makes me uneasy is that in court, _ delivered. one thing that makes me uneasy is that in court, does - uneasy is that in court, does mention— uneasy is that in court, does mention that _ uneasy is that in court, does mention that this _ uneasy is that in court, does mention that this was - uneasy is that in court, does mention that this was a - uneasy is that in court, does . mention that this was a unique uneasy is that in court, does - mention that this was a unique case not much _ mention that this was a unique case not much or— mention that this was a unique case not much or it — mention that this was a unique case not much or it is _ mention that this was a unique case not much or it is and _ mention that this was a unique case not much or it is and devotees is. not much or it is and devotees is difficult — not much or it is and devotees is difficult and _ not much or it is and devotees is difficult and different _ not much or it is and devotees is difficult and different and - not much or it is and devotees is difficult and different and one i difficult and different and one feels — difficult and different and one feels enormous _ difficult and different and one feels enormous sympathy- difficult and different and one feels enormous sympathy for| difficult and different and one . feels enormous sympathy for the family— feels enormous sympathy for the family and — feels enormous sympathy for the family and the _ feels enormous sympathy for the family and the circumstances - feels enormous sympathy for the family and the circumstances butj feels enormous sympathy for the . family and the circumstances but is there _ family and the circumstances but is there another— family and the circumstances but is there another danger— family and the circumstances but is there another danger that - family and the circumstances but is there another danger that it- family and the circumstances but is there another danger that it said i there another danger that it said some _ there another danger that it said some sort— there another danger that it said some sort of— there another danger that it said some sort of precedent - there another danger that it said some sort of precedent for- there another danger that it said | some sort of precedent for these matters? — some sort of precedent for these matters? is— some sort of precedent for these matters? is are _ some sort of precedent for these matters? is are not _ some sort of precedent for these matters? is are not a _ some sort of precedent for these matters? is are not a danger- some sort of precedent for these matters? is are not a danger to i matters? is are not a danger to sometime — matters? is are not a danger to sometime next— matters? is are not a danger to sometime next and _ matters? is are not a danger toj sometime next and somewhere matters? is are not a danger to i sometime next and somewhere that deliberates— sometime next and somewhere that deliberates those _ sometime next and somewhere that deliberates those were _ sometime next and somewhere that deliberates those were preps - sometime next and somewhere that deliberates those were preps in i sometime next and somewhere that deliberates those were preps in a i deliberates those were preps in a slightly— deliberates those were preps in a slightly different _ deliberates those were preps in a slightly different situation - deliberates those were preps in a slightly different situation and i deliberates those were preps in a j slightly different situation and we headed _ slightly different situation and we headed debate _ slightly different situation and we headed debate in— slightly different situation and we headed debate in westminster. slightly different situation and we i headed debate in westminster and in the scottish— headed debate in westminster and in the scottish parliament _ headed debate in westminster and in the scottish parliament over- headed debate in westminster and in the scottish parliament over the i the scottish parliament over the assisted — the scottish parliament over the assisted dying _ the scottish parliament over the assisted dying that _ the scottish parliament over the assisted dying that is _ the scottish parliament over the assisted dying that is made i assisted dying that is made relatively— assisted dying that is made relatively little _ assisted dying that is made relatively little progress i assisted dying that is made i relatively little progress because senior _ relatively little progress because senior politicians _ relatively little progress because senior politicians and _ relatively little progress because

Family , Support , Community , Judgment , Lawyer , Backing , Northern-england , Friends , Some , Support-of , Northeast-ofl , Court-of-appeal

CNN Tonight

said, he's not gonna be in control of this whatsoever for that very reason. but the complexity of the net, if they were simply looking at taxation, i would say, this is unbelievably long. but the net was cast for over a decade in business dealings, including an energy tycoon in china, burisma, again, i mentioned. with a net so wide, and so thorough it seemed to go over that period of time, that's why think people should feel very, well, in support of, and confident, of the outcome. that it was comprehensive. that's why it undermines the talking points. >> i hear you on, that in the court of public opinion, we're gonna see people having mixed minds. on the one hand, this is a good thing. hunter is being held accountable. nobody's above law in this country, it's a beautiful thing. on the other hand it's like, man, he did the crime, should he do the time? that's in the mind of the average voter. leaving the door open about, if hunter did this, if how tricky do the crimes, what did the father? know even though they're similar talking about adult son and the father should not have responsibility for it, it does draw the question?

Net , Cast , Complexity , Burisma , Reason , Business-dealings , Control , Taxation , Energy-tycoon , China , People , Outcome

CNN News Central

which is what we thought we might get today. the problem with that is that doesn't tell us which side they're on. it doesn't tell us which result that's in support of. it just suggests that whatever ruling we get from the full court on friday, is going to have either or both of some explanation by the majority about why they either are or are not staying. the judge, cosmetics ruling pending appeal and or separate concurrences and dissents, so i think it raises the odds that there will be explanations on friday, but i don't think it really tilts the scales that heavily toward which result will get in. it really is just a play for time on the court's part. jennifer and again, we realized we're asking you guys to read tea leaves here and no one is inside that room right now. but john biskupic made the point. i think you made it as well, jennifer that if they had the votes to issue a more lasting stay here, stay pending appeal that they would have done it not punted. another well, 50 some odd hours until midnight friday . do you? do you read that jennifer rogers in that way? i

Us , Problem , Court , Doesn-t , Result , Explanation , It-doesn-t , Both , Support-of , Cosmetics , Majority , Judge

Morning Joe

today is a bill that will essentially, you know, approve the deal that they thought they already it with the unions and with the biden administration and the rail companies, but they are also going to do a separate vote on offering paid sick leave to many of these rail workers. that's a key sticking point and something that progressives are strongly in support of, but doing two separate votes in the house today so they can get it over the finish line and see if it has the votes to get it done here in the senate. a very, very busy day here just an example of what we expect is going to take place over the next couple of weeks. >> ryan, also, the january 6th committee final report. any word on when that'ses going to come out and who else they still need to talk to in the short amount of time that they have? >> reporter: yeah. it's crazy how busy they still are, mika. in fact, we reported for, among the first to report that robin vos, the assembly speaker in wisconsin is scheduled to meet with the committee today.

Joe-biden , Vote , Administration , Bill , Deal , Sick-leave , Rail-companies , Offering , Unions , Something , U-s-senate , Votes

Breakfast

look out for today. we could hear from _ look out for today. we could hear from suella — look out for today. we could hear from suella braverman, - look out for today. we could hear from suella braverman, the - look out for today. we could hear. from suella braverman, the ousted home _ from suella braverman, the ousted home secretary. _ from suella braverman, the ousted home secretary, she _ from suella braverman, the ousted home secretary, she could - from suella braverman, the ousted home secretary, she could give - from suella braverman, the ousted home secretary, she could give a l home secretary, she could give a resignation — home secretary, she could give a resignation speech— home secretary, she could give a resignation speech and _ home secretary, she could give a resignation speech and there - home secretary, she could give a resignation speech and there are| resignation speech and there are some _ resignation speech and there are some talks — resignation speech and there are some talks that _ resignation speech and there are some talks that ministers - resignation speech and there are some talks that ministers will. resignation speech and there are some talks that ministers will go resignation speech and there are i some talks that ministers will go to liz truss_ some talks that ministers will go to liz truss and — some talks that ministers will go to liz truss and say— some talks that ministers will go to liz truss and say she _ some talks that ministers will go to liz truss and say she should - liz truss and say she should consider_ liz truss and say she should consider her— liz truss and say she should consider her position. - liz truss and say she should consider her position. right| liz truss and say she should - consider her position. right now downing — consider her position. right now downing street _ consider her position. right now downing street say _ consider her position. right now downing street say they- consider her position. right now downing street say they are - consider her position. right now- downing street say they are digging in and _ downing street say they are digging in and liz_ downing street say they are digging in and liz truss _ downing street say they are digging in and liz truss has _ downing street say they are digging in and liz truss has no _ downing street say they are digging in and liz truss has no plans - downing street say they are digging in and liz truss has no plans to - downing street say they are digging in and liz truss has no plans to go. | in and liz truss has no plans to go. she still_ in and liz truss has no plans to go. she still has— in and liz truss has no plans to go. she still has some _ in and liz truss has no plans to go. she still has some support- in and liz truss has no plans to go. she still has some support of- she still has some support of ministers _ she still has some support of ministers. steve _ she still has some support of ministers. steve baker, - she still has some support of ministers. steve baker, andi she still has some support of. ministers. steve baker, and he she still has some support of- ministers. steve baker, and he is ultimately— ministers. steve baker, and he is ultimately saying _ ministers. steve baker, and he is ultimately saying she _ ministers. steve baker, and he is ultimately saying she should - ministers. steve baker, and he is ultimately saying she should stayi ultimately saying she should stay for now — ultimately saying she should stay for now it — ultimately saying she should stay for now. it feels _ ultimately saying she should stay for now. it feels as _ ultimately saying she should stay for now. it feels as though - ultimately saying she should stay for now. it feels as though she i ultimately saying she should stay for now. it feels as though she is| for now. it feels as though she is in the _ for now. it feels as though she is in the greatest _ for now. it feels as though she is in the greatest danger— for now. it feels as though she is in the greatest danger yet, - for now. it feels as though she is in the greatest danger yet, i- for now. it feels as though she is l in the greatest danger yet, i think. where _ in the greatest danger yet, i think. where has — in the greatest danger yet, i think. where has the _ in the greatest danger yet, i think. where has the greatest _ in the greatest danger yet, i think. where has the greatest danger- in the greatest danger yet, i think. . where has the greatest danger come from? when you look at the inner circle, and i use the words loosely, cabinet ministers, where do the risks come from for the next ones who might stand up and say i have had enough? i who might stand up and say i have had enough?— had enough? i think in appointing jerem had enough? i think in appointing jeremy hunt _ had enough? i think in appointing jeremy hunt she _ had enough? i think in appointing jeremy hunt she made _ had enough? i think in appointing jeremy hunt she made her - had enough? i think in appointing - jeremy hunt she made her chancellor jeremy hunt she made her chancellor and suckahie — jeremy hunt she made her chancellor and suckable and _ jeremy hunt she made her chancellor and suckable and this— jeremy hunt she made her chancellor and suckable and this is— jeremy hunt she made her chancellor and suckable and this is not— jeremy hunt she made her chancellor and suckable and this is not to say. and suckable and this is not to say thatjeremy— and suckable and this is not to say that jeremy hunt _ and suckable and this is not to say thatjeremy hunt will— and suckable and this is not to say that jeremy hunt will move, - and suckable and this is not to say that jeremy hunt will move, but . and suckable and this is not to say. that jeremy hunt will move, but were he about— that jeremy hunt will move, but were he about to _ that jeremy hunt will move, but were he about to call — that jeremy hunt will move, but were he about to call time _ that jeremy hunt will move, but were he about to call time that _ that jeremy hunt will move, but were he about to call time that would - that jeremy hunt will move, but were he about to call time that would be i he about to call time that would be destabitising — he about to call time that would be destabilising as— he about to call time that would be destabilising as his _ he about to call time that would be destabilising as his appointment i he about to call time that would be i destabilising as his appointment was meant _ destabilising as his appointment was

Liz-truss , Home-secretary , Ministers , Position , Suella-braverman , Truss , Liz-truss- , Street , Downing-street , Al , Home , Suella-braverman-ran

CNN Tonight

here, even though we have been talking to you for a year, or thereabouts, that i have not heard before. so, let me read an excerpt from the book. >> one of the things you bring up is how basically after you started telling the truth about what happened. your colleagues, some of your colleagues turned their backs on you. and you say it's not lost on me, but most the venom came from white cops. blackhawks, for the most part, where support of. from them, i got handshakes and hugs. most white cops avoided eye contact. a few literally turned their backs. what is that about? >> i mean, that was just an observation that i made, again, you can draw your own conclusions. >> but i cannot. what is that? meaning that the white cops were supportive of what happened on january 6th? >> to be completely honest with you, i do not know. i know that obviously there are a lot more white cops that were, like, hard-line trump supporters, not just people that voted for donald trump.

Things , Book , Truth , One , Excerpt , Thereabouts , Part , Some , Colleagues , White , Cops , Blackhawks

Alex Wagner Tonight

prevent fires. cut emissions. and cleaner air. >> if you turn on russian tv yes on 30. news today, he might have seen this, the massive 50,000 person rallies slash concert in moscow supporting the war in ukraine. specifically, it was an event to support the multiple referendums that started today to make the parts of ukraine under russian control officially part of russia. the russia rally was also in support of, quote, the mobilization of russian men in the military as russia ramps up the war that they did not

Russia , Cleaner , Prevent-fires , Cut-emissions , 30 , Tv-news , Person-rallies-slash-concert-in-moscow , 50000 , Quote , War , Parts , Men

Alex Wagner Tonight

and we need to reduce the tailpipe emissions that are driving changes to our climate. that's why cal fire firefighters, the american lung association, and the california democratic party support prop 30. prevent fires. cut emissions. and cleaner air. yes on 30. >> if you turn on russian tv news today, he might have seen this, the massive 50,000 person rallies slash concert in moscow supporting the war in ukraine. specifically, it was an event to support the multiple referendums that started today to make the parts of ukraine under russian control officially part of russia. the russia rally was also in support of, quote, the mobilization of russian men in the military as russia ramps up the war that they did not expect to lose. if you watch this, you would think russians are happy, but

Russia , Prop , Tailpipe-emissions , Tv-news , Changes , California-democratic-party , Climate , Cleaner , Cal-fire-firefighters , Prevent-fires , Cut-emissions , American-lung-association

Alex Wagner Tonight

support of, quote, the mobilization of russian men in the military as russia ramps up the war that they did not expect to lose. if you watch this, you would think russians are happy, but if you went to the finish russian border, you would see this, lines of cars filled with people leaving russia to avoid the draft. this man who described himself to the ap only as uri from moscow underscored his reason for leaving saying, i, think no one, a sane person, wants to go to war. this line was of cars that was between russia and kazakhstan today. where a russian will not need a visa. before the announcement of the drop, the average plane ticket cost was about 300 bucks. now, the cheapest ticket, the cheapest take, it is more than $8,000. people are leaving in droves. and those who aren't are very quickly facing a tough reality. forgive the weird shark like water mark on this video. it is a symbol of a russian

Quote , War , Russia , Men , Mobilization , Russians , Military , Finish-russian-border , Support-of , People , Man , Reason