Stay updated with breaking news from Trust certificate. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
aaron david miller says, this is it's reflective of one of the most tense moments, a boiling point in a relationship between two liters that spanned about for decades, i would say without a doubt the confidence that this president has in this prime minister the trust that is critically important between an american president and israeli prime minister sure. to get things done. i think has been broken. >> just a few days ago, the tensions had spiked again when president biden announced that israel had offered a three-phase proposal to end the war israel is offer a comprehensive new proposal it's a roadmap. >> i've urge leadership is on the stand behind this deal but since that announcement, netanyahu himself has not publicly endorsed that plan, even though it came from his own government, we begin to seem into the outselling to backtrack to keep his options open, trying to save his majority fall, right? members of netanyahu's government have
well, it is because what we saw today and not the first time anderson, i think as congressman can find it out is the difference between acute and non conspiracy chat room with the crazy de conspiracy theories that have been spawned. >> a congressional hearing has narrowed now to almost nil. why is that concerning if you're the justice department, if you're the fbi there are people out there because this is the lai oft repeated just becomes some kind of truth there are people out there that these investigators will be interviewing, will be seeing would be investigating where they expect that trust and confidence in the fbi and the justice department and this foments, these doubts, these are sworn oath taking career civil servants. i worked in the fbi. i dealt with the department of justice every day. these are people who as i did, worked for republicans,
approach. trump is unpredictable. we're not totally sure what he would do in ukraine. but biden last year it took seven months to get the $60 billion supplemental through for ukraine, but that finally got over the hump when republicans agreed to it. biden took that as a victy as he should, but it was hard and really did erode american standing in europe. nato leaders i talked to are spooked by that episode of not getting that package through for so many months, and it eroded a lot of trust in europe for the united states and even how long the united states will stick in with ukraine. the united states is not about to abandon ukrainian a second biden administration, but we don't know how much more money is coming, how much more patience the u.s. government and congress either controlled by democrats or republicans will have for continuing this funding for a war in ukraine. >> paul, then later in the week after the d-day ceremonies biden
CNN News Central vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
president engineered the open border. he signed at least 65, maybe 70 more executive orders. to borrow a phrase from years past, what difference at this point will this make? >> you can't erase the damage that has been done, right? you can't erase the huge numbers of people already here. you also can't erase the lack of trust for this administration. they are acknowledging it is a crisis. they've been confused for a long time. voters aren't confused and in the top three issues for many of them despite economic issues. they're feeling pressure and the opposite of what biden offered to them, he said i'll bring order, not chaos. this feels like chaos. let me be clear. i think you have to deal with the cynicism here. it speaks to whether you can trust this administration on this issue. this is not a border crisis for them, this is a re-election crisis for them. this is a last-ditch effort to
we have dry burdex and the at night on cnn i see what works for us makes it less power hello, trust so you can rise from pain i see is this dog food in your fridge? >> it's not dog food. it's fresh pit, real meat, real ventures seems like a lot of space to waste on a dog you're all the family i need attention. former marines and family members stationed to camp plus june, if you lived or work that can't lose you in north carolina for at least 30 days from august 1953 to december 1987, and has been diagnosed with cancer, neuro behavioral effects the child born with birth defects or been diagnosed with fertility issues are more significant compensation may be available called legal injury advocates. now, to discuss your case, got 1800 013636. that's 1805
hear is scary numbers, but now doubt has been cast on the claim, he risks something else — public trust. jessica parker, bbc news in westminster. our chief political correspondent henry zeffman is here — henry, how will labour and the conservatives be feeling about their leaders' performances now? in the immediate aftermath of the debate i think the conservatives were pleased because they had put these questions about the labour tax plans right into the mix of this general election campaign. but this morning i think it has become clear that in the process they've unleashed a separate row about rishi sunak and his honesty and character and that will be harder for them to control. i was sitting here this morning when i got hold of that letter from the chief civil servant at the treasury which did seem to shake up this particular issue. the fightback is now beginning from the conservative party, the chief secretary of the treasury laura trott insisting even if not the entire figure is from treasury
got people talking about whether labour would raise taxes. to the electorate care about the detail in something like this? what does it do for a trust? ih something like this? what does it do for a trust? .., something like this? what does it do for a trust? , something like this? what does it do fora trust? , ., something like this? what does it do for a trust? ,., ._ , ., , for a trust? in some ways, that is robabl for a trust? in some ways, that is probably rrot _ for a trust? in some ways, that is probably rrot a — for a trust? in some ways, that is probably not a bad _ for a trust? in some ways, that is probably not a bad thing - for a trust? in some ways, that is probably not a bad thing because | probably not a bad thing because although this episode reflects disgracefully on rishi sunak and the conservatives, there is a broader point that i many others are making about the dishonesty of both parties and effectively saying we're not going to put taxes encase the conservatives cut them, and we are not going to cut public services, when almost all economists would say those numbers simply don't add up. regardless of the specific detail what labour or conservative actually either over the medium—term, some taxes will have to go up or we are the current state of public services, which is bad enough with the nhs, the courts and prisons and
important reason why labour doesn't want, isn't talking about tax rises because the labour party is a different position, the labour party always has to win the trust of the people, against the assumption and the accusation it will be profligate. it is not so long ago the labour party was led by a leadership that was free with imaginary money that it was going to spend and so i would endorse what keir starmer and rachel reeves have done, in keeping it tight. late keir starmer and rachel reeves have done, in keeping it tight.— done, in keeping it tight. we will back with you — done, in keeping it tight. we will back with you shortly. _ that row over tax emerged in last night's tv debate. the next one is a seven way affair on friday night on bbc one, hosted by mishal husain, and these are the seven people taking part — penny mordaunt from the tories, angela raynerfrom labour, stephen flynn snp, rheen ap yoreth from plaid cymru. nigel farage from reform, carla denyer from the greens and daisy cooper from the liberal democrats. it all starts at 7.30.
and now that we have left the eu we need to be pragmatic about what happens, we need to start with building the relationships and getting back the trust that has been lost and damaged between us and our european partners, we want to look at some of those side agreements and the youth mobility schemes, mutual recognition and professional qualifications... i recognition and professional qualifications. . .— recognition and professional qualifications... i will go back to the 2019 lib _ qualifications... i will go back to the 2019 lib dems _ qualifications... i will go back to the 2019 lib dems manifesto, . qualifications... i will go back to the 2019 lib dems manifesto, itj qualifications... i will go back to - the 2019 lib dems manifesto, it was very clear, and we had left... we were about to leave, stop brexit, it says, do you still want to stop brexit? in says, do you still want to stop brexit? ii' ' says, do you still want to stop brexit? ::' ' ., , ., brexit? in 2019 there was an opportunity _ brexit? in 2019 there was an opportunity still _ brexit? in 2019 there was an opportunity still to _ brexit? in 2019 there was an i opportunity still to stop brexit by democratic means. what we are saying now, we are in a different place. you don't want to overturn it? taste you don't want to overturn it? we need to you don't want to overturn it? - need to move back to a closer relationship with europe and we have a four step process and i was talking you through the steps. i want to be clear, and you can say