The 10 most talked about news stories of the year but 1st homelessness in the usa how our tax dollars are literally paying to dispose of the most vulnerable americans. Cook in washington this is the big picture on our t. V. America. Thousands of homeless families who used to live in new york city shelters have moved elsewhere their move funded by a new York City Program called sotto meaning special one time assistance the soda Program Provides one years full rent up front to move within new york city to other new york state county is or to another state or puerto rico or washington d. C. See so to it can be accessed by working individuals and families and those who receive s. S. I. S. S. D. Etc as long as there is the future ability to make rent payments based on the households rent not exceeding 50 percent of the households income but what if they cant pay their own rent after that 1st year the mayor of nearby newark new jersey says the soto program is already failing those so 2. 00 m
Themselves for others, including the mother of three shielding her 2monthold. Now the suspected shooter in custody. This as we hear from some of these heroes who raced in running toward the gunfire, risking their lives to save others. And in ohio, chaos in downtown dayton. We got shots fired. We got multiple people down. Were going to need multiple medics. A gunman killing nine people, including his sister, and injuring more than two dozen. The dramatic surveillance images showing people running for their lives and police on the scene taking out the shooter in just 30 seconds, saving countless lives with their quick action. Overnight the powerful vigils and the calls for action. President trump set to address the nation this morning, facing questions about how his rhetoric is fueling the violence. Now some lawmakers calling for bold measures, demanding congress be called back to washington to act right now. Will this time be different . And what you can do to help. Our special edition
This is from april. Its an hour. Case 15577. Trinity lutheran church. The state of new york excluded the Learning Center from a safer playground from children because it was operated by a Church Rather than a not for profit. Number one that the policy in this case is not neutral. Churches are not eligible for the benefit here. Assuming theres no serious risk of an establishment violation, thats off the table, are there ever instances in which status, religious status can be used to deny religion or religious believers, benefits from the state . Or are you saying that religious status can never be the basis for it. The question is why would it matter. The next question then i guess wasnt long ago now back in 1947 this court said in no uncertain terms, with tax money imposed to pay for building or maintaining churches or Church Property and doesnt that fit this case . And if so. I dont think it does. We have to be careful in not establishing a church not to deprive religious people or or
This is from april. Its an hour. Case 15577. Trinity lutheran church. The state of new york excluded the Learning Center from a safer playground from children because it was operated by a Church Rather than a not for profit. Number one that the policy in this case is not neutral. Churches are not eligible for the benefit here. Assuming theres no serious risk of an establishment violation, thats off the table, are there ever instances in which status, religious status can be used to deny religion or religious believers, benefits from the state . Or are you saying that religious status can never be the basis for it. The question is why would it matter. The next question then i guess wasnt long ago now back in 1947 this court said in no uncertain terms, with tax money imposed to pay for building or maintaining churches or Church Property and doesnt that fit this case . And if so. I dont think it does. We have to be careful in not establishing a church not to deprive religious people or or
Solely because of the preschool is operated by a Church Rather than a secular, not profit. The state has made several important concessions in this case. Number one that the policy in this case is not neutral and that number two based on the religious character churches are not eligible for the benefit here. This admitted discoloration against religion violates this court free exercise principles. First, as stated in mcdaniel and smith, free exercise clause prevents the government from imposing special disabilities on the basis of religion and used a religious status. And forcing a choice between the exercise of religion and receiving either a government benefit, right or privilege. Assuming that there is no serious risk of an establishment violation, thats off the table are there any instances in which status, religious status, can be used to deny religions or religious believers benefits from the state or are you saying that its absent in the establishment clause problem . The status