Stay updated with breaking news from You rerun. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
south china sea. back in 2016 the pentagon key is a chinese of drone from the u.s. navy and digging all the '2001 the ep three during the bush administration collided with the chinese fighter jet the crew held for 11 days parentheses latest chapter of espionage between the united states and china, mike looks good contacts are lucas thompson live on the lawn thank you very much. arthel: all right, lucas and mike general keith kellogg signed and sent to former national security adviser to vice president mike pence and fox news contributor general kellogg so good to speak with you. i wanted to ask spencer why should chinese spy balloon go down into the saltwater of the atlantic ocean what concerns you in salvaging whatever information intelligence has been collected? >> if you rerun this pictures and look closely think the package the sensor package and disconnected from the balloon
this case, they regret it. >> please. >> they're very hard to control. once you're in a crowd, you don't know how a crowd is going to move. you don't know how it's going to react to the police presence. you don't know how the police are going to react. you don't, you know, so crowds are very dangerous. >> oh yeah. yeah. because you dealt directly with the committee, i'm curious about something that's more on the level of footnotes, but we're deep into our coverage here. they didn't meet their own deadlines on the report. here we are on an ultimate news dump friday. if you rerun this, you'd think they were trying to bury it. they had, of course, viewed this as something they wanted to get out there. i'm curious if you had any view about how this committee ended and the sort of their self-imposed deadlines they didn't meet, the delays, et cetera. in contrast to a lot of the other hearings.
from the republican establishment, that this is somebody we think we can control, a better bet, fresh and new, and is not going to have the baggage trump has. the issue with trump isn't what he did, it's their fear that trump could lose. that has always been their guiding idea, and i think they worry that donald trump is a goner in another election, and somebody like ron desantis could be brought in and replace him very, very easily. >> right, and to your point, donald trump got fewer votes in '16. he got fewer votes in '20. he has proved resilient in many ways, i think viewers know, but the notion everything that's going on is going to somehow miraculously make him not the same, but bet derr -- he would have to increase his popularity and appeal in vote total. if you rerun the biden/trump election, he lost. who believed that? none other than ron desantis. take a look.
result of the epidemic in liberia a civilians and reporting system was put in place is a regional one across west africa. i am eddie micah jr is a start off another week your welcome to the program. now this map philip in u.c. will remain president of mozambique for the next 5 years after the landslide win he won 73 percent of the vote. his party won just under 3 quarters of the parliamentary seats according to the official results announced on sunday was a bieksa position house call for you rerun of the general election a legend widespread cheating intimidation violence and votes rigging claims the
a bieksa position called for you rerun of the general election a legend widespread cheating intimidation violence and votes rigging claims the ruling party the nice. 2 very different views of the same vote. candidate philippe new u.z. had 4000000 507549 votes. the incumbent and his supporters call the official results a landslide but the opposition sees it as a whitewash the real results painted over something that go even within mozambique's electoral commission we are witnessing here a national shame. 8 members just under half of the national electoral commission say the commission is most important election tasks were done in secret without them and the final vote document does not include their signatures the commission
america, accuse bill clinton of murder. you had others suggesting that bill clinton had murdered vince foster, had murdered ron brown. i just -- i am stunned by what ro rock feller said. >> if you rerun the tape is that some of the opposition to president obama and his signature legislation is because he's the wrong color. senator rockefeller believes that. and frankly if you were to see my e-mail and my snail mail and see some of the stuff i get, you would agree. now, does that mean that -- is that calling ron johnson is racist? it's not calling him a racist. that's making an observation about in general some of the
we're talking about the growing obama coalition of voters and problems facing the republican party trying to compete with the changing elect rat. here with baratuned thurston, michelle goldberg, and josh barro. i want to run through this counterfactual. the white house had an opportunity when that case was filed in court. i believe in 2011. they had defended the law, doma, previously on another case in massachusetts. and they had a decision to face. do you defend the law or do you not? it is a very, very big deal for the executive, for the department of justice not to defend a statute that is good federal law. it does not happen that often. it's a big deal when they do. the choice they made not to defend it, if you rerun the history of yesterday in which they defend that law not only does yesterday look different, yesterday was an unequivocal victory for barack obama, the democratic party. they were able to tweet celebration. he was able to comment. nothing tainted about it. not only does that go out the window, but the president coming
republican party trying to compete with the changing electorate. here with baratuned thurston, michelle goldberg, and josh barro. i want to run through this counterfactual. the white house had an opportunity when that case was filed in court. i believe in 2011. they had defended the law, doma, previously on another case in massachusetts. and they had a decision to face. do you defend the law or do you not? it is a very, very big deal for the executive, for the department of justice not to defend a statute that is good federal law. it does not happen that often. it's a big deal when they do. the choice they made not to defend it, if you rerun the history of yesterday in which they defend that law not only does yesterday look different, yesterday was an unequivocal victory for barack obama, the democratic party. they were able to tweet celebration. he was able to comment. nothing tainted about it. not only does that go out the window, but the president coming out for marriage equality during the election year goes out the window, too, because there's no way he could have done that if
growing obama coalition of voters and problems facing the republican party trying to compete with the changing elect rat. here with baratuned thurston, michelle goldberg, and josh barro. i want to run through this counterfactual. the white house had an opportunity when that case was filed in court. i believe in 2011. they had defended the law, doma, previously on another case in massachusetts. and they had a decision to face. do you defend the law or do you not? it is a very, very big deal for the executive, for the department of justice not to defend a statute that is good federal law. it does not happen that often. it's a big deal when they do. the choice they made not to defend it, if you rerun the history of yesterday in which they defend that law not only does yesterday look different, yesterday was an unequivocal victory for barack obama, the democratic party. they were able to tweet celebration. he was able to comment. nothing tainted about it. not only does that go out the window, but the president coming