in this country and therefore there was no reason to allow it to stay in place until you do have a show of proof. >> well, i would -- i would say what isis has said. they've said they're actively trying to exploit this program to get bad people in this country which will do us harm. >> that doesn't give you the threshold of imminent threat. look at your stats. look what is happening. >> terrorists saying they're going to exploit our program. >> imminent threat shows proof of that infiltration, shows actual threat to you, actionable intelligence. you have none of that. >> chris, remember that this is consistent with legislation that passed the house of representatives a little over a year ago that 47 democrats supported. the president said he would veto it, but 47 democrats said after the terrorist attack in paris and san bernardino that this kind of policy made sense especially in light of what isis has said, that they're actively trying to exploit the program. so this is entirely consistent