chief justice john roberts argued to the fact that federal judges have no license to reallocate political power between the two major parties with no grant of authority in the constitution. in other words, they can't get involved in a partisan political matter. the only thing confusing about that decision, whether you support it or not, whether it benefits democrats in one period or republicans in another period. they often come in the middle to resolve political disputes. >> absolutely. i thought that was confusing too. i've seen court challenges and judges injecting them 70s in this process. it's an important point that you make. what is interesting and in which ari talked about, we talked about the gerrymandering part of what scotus decided on. in the decision about the census, justice alito made the same argument for the minority when he said judges should not be injecting them 70s into the census question, so that was i