plausibly agreed with the conduct of the people inside the capitol that day? so he is asking this question because trump and all these other people that were sued, rudy giuliani, his son, proud boys, oath keepers, are all arguing the case should get tossed out and shouldn't go on in the court and test whether it's legally viable. they are making all kinds of claims saying this can't be a conspiracy. also that trump should be totally protected because he was president at the time. that that means he has some sort of absolute immunity regarding everything that he says whenever there can be lawsuits that come up. all of these people are also arguing they have first amendment protections. meda was really tough on trump's lawyers on the conspiracy question. he didn't show his hand where he stood otherwise and we didn't get a ruling out of him yet. this is a set of important cases, an important standpoint was he has to decide whether the cases can go on and people could hold potentially trump accountable for the insurrection

Related Keywords

Question , People , Case , Son , Trump , Conduct , Capitol , Oath Keepers , Boys , Rudy Giuliani , Test , Didn T , Conspiracy , Sort , Court , Kinds , Claims , Shouldnt Go On , Immunity , Will Donald Trump , Everything , All , Lawsuits , Smeda , Protections , Lawyers , Conspiracy Question , Amendment , Cases , Standpoint , Insurrection , Hand , Ruling , Set ,