the jury's mind? i mean, as you're -- as a prosecutor sitting there, is there a lot of weight for you on the first things i say here? if by the way, you've always already said lot in jury selection. >> right. for me it was always about an overall central. so everything from the moment i started picking a jury through opening statement was where is this going to end up, what are my vulnerabilities, how do i prep the jury, what are my strong point, how do i prep them for the strong points, so it's all a part of if they're doing their job correctly an overall theme that's been planned out. will: again, it's a trial, and you think it's all about a evidence, but it's answer helping people make what is -- about helping people make what is often emotional decisions. what is the theme of both sides in this? >> so it's the an unusual case on so many levels. but for the defense, they're going to argue at the the end that even if every single fact that the prosecution presented is accepted as truthful and fact, they're going to say it still doesn't make it a crime.