question is. were you doing something as part of your official acts? i think he's been bringing that far, far, too broadly, but was it in your personal capacity. in the criminal side, which is what we're talking about, the jack smith prosecution, related to january 6th, there was a question about whether he's entitled to immunity, even for the scope of things in an official act. and remember, his own attorney admitted that he could be criminally responsible for things done within the scope of his official acts, but only if he were impeached, and convicted by the senate first. but still, that was an important concession. because it says, or she could be prosecuted for things you did within the scope of a presidential run. >> reporter: as isolates to the quest of accountability, and how the system of justice handle someone like donald trump, i'm not sure if you caught this entire back and forth, but the trump team was asking for a postponement in the e. jean carroll case. the judge denied that postponement, and, then you had trump announcing that he was going to do a campaign event in new hampshire, less than 24